Cited by 1,267Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

A Low-Carbohydrate as Compared with a Low-Fat Diet in Severe Obesity

Open access
Samaha, Frederick F., Iqbal, Nayyar, Seshadri, Prakash, Chicano, Kathryn L., Daily, Denise A., McGrory, Joyce, Williams, Terrence, Williams, Monica +2 more·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of a carbohydrate-restricted diet on weight loss and risk factors for atherosclerosis have been incompletely assessed. METHODS: We randomly assigned 132 severely obese subjects (including 77 blacks and 23 women) with a mean body-mass index of 43 and a high prevalence of diabetes (39 percent) or the metabolic syndrome (43 percent) to a carbohydrate-restricted (low-carbohydrate) diet or a calorie- and fat-restricted (low-fat) diet. RESULTS: Seventy-nine subjects completed the six-month study. An analysis including all subjects, with the last observation carried forward for those who dropped out, showed that subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet lost more weight than those on the low-fat diet (mean [+/-SD], -5.8+/-8.6 kg vs. -1.9+/-4.2 kg; P=0.002) and had greater decreases in triglyceride levels (mean, -20+/-43 percent vs. -4+/-31 percent; P=0.001), irrespective of the use or nonuse of hypoglycemic or lipid-lowering medications. Insulin sensitivity, measured only in subjects without diabetes, also improved more among subjects on the low-carbohydrate diet (6+/-9 percent vs. -3+/-8 percent, P=0.01). The amount of weight lost (P<0.001) and assignment to the low-carbohydrate diet (P=0.01) were independent predictors of improvement in triglyceride levels and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Severely obese subjects with a high prevalence of diabetes or the metabolic syndrome lost more weight during six months on a carbohydrate-restricted diet than on a calorie- and fat-restricted diet, with a relative improvement in insulin sensitivity and triglyceride levels, even after adjustment for the amount of weight lost. This finding should be interpreted with caution, given the small magnitude of overall and between-group differences in weight loss in these markedly obese subjects and the short duration of the study. Future studies evaluating long-term cardiovascular outcomes are needed before a carbohydrate-restricted diet can be endorsed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa022637

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The trial did not confirm earlier findings that low-carbohydrate or high-protein diets caused greater weight loss at six months and that this advantage eroded by twelve months.

    “We did not confirm previous findings that low-carbohydrate or high-protein diets caused increased weight loss at 6 months3–12 and that the advantage of these diets usually eroded by 12 months, with weight loss that was nearly or fully equivalent to that with low-fat diets6,11,18 or other diets.12”

    From Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates (2009) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Weight Loss section reports significantly greater weight loss with the low-carbohydrate diet than with the low-fat diet at six months. The paper studied only six months and says it is unclear whether the benefits extend beyond that point; it cannot support the claim that the weight-loss advantage eroded by twelve months. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets may cause spontaneous reduction in calorie intake and increased weight loss, especially in the short term.

    “Nevertheless, low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets may lead to spontaneous reduction in calorie reduction and increased weight loss, especially over the short term50–52.”

    From Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity (2018) · cites this paper as [52]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Short-term trials comparing low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets with conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets have yielded inconsistent results.

    “Several trials showed that low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets resulted in more weight loss over the course of 3 to 6 months than conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets,4–12 but other studies did not show this effect.13–17”
  • Significant reductions in fat mass including truncal fat have been demonstrated in many studies with low carbohydrate diets.

    “Significant reductions in fat mass including truncal fat, which is a marker for visceral obesity, have been demonstrated in many studies [9,11,26,29].”

    From The case for low carbohydrate diets in diabetes management (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Despite advocating ad libitum fat and protein intake, a LoCHO diet may be hypocaloric either by design or by spontaneous reduction of intake.

    “It is interesting that despite advocating ad libitum fat and protein intake, a LoCHO diet may be hypocaloric either by design or by spontaneous reduction of intake [8-12].”

    From The case for low carbohydrate diets in diabetes management (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samaha, F. F., Iqbal, N., Seshadri, P., Chicano, K. L., Daily, D. A., McGrory, J., Williams, T., Williams, M., Gracely, E. J., & Stern, L.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-05-22
Volume
348
Issue
21
Pages
2074-2081
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2154184102
Cited by
1,267
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 62
FWCI
70.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, morbid obesity, weight loss, triglycerides, insulin sensitivity, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis risk factors, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Arteriosclerosis, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review