Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissecting the energy needs of the body

McClave, Stephen A., Snider, Harvy L.·2001·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

The majority of the resting energy expenditure can be explained by the energy needs of a few highly metabolic organs, making up a small percentage of the body by weight. The relationship of the specific size, individual metabolism, and proportional contribution to the actual body weight and total energy expenditure for each of these organs is a dynamic process throughout growth and development, the onset of disease, and changes in nutritional status. Defining the energy needs of the individual tissues and organ systems immeasurably enhances our understanding of the body's response to these clinical processes, which otherwise could not easily be evaluated by focusing solely on total energy expenditure, fat-free mass, nitrogen imbalance, or actual body weight. Recently reported studies have served mainly to reinforce concepts described previously, and clarify some areas of controversy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00075197-200103000-00011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Holliday, 1967, Pediatr Res, 1, 185, 10.1203/00006450-196705000-00005 · DOI
  2. Davies, 1961, J Cell Comp Physiol, 57, 135, 10.1002/jcp.1030570302 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kety, 1948, J Clin Invest, 27, 476, 10.1172/JCI101994 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Illner, 2000, Am J Physiol, 278, E308
  5. Taylor, 1950, Science, 112, 215, 10.1126/science.112.2904.215 · DOI
  6. Fellows, 1985, Clin Sci, 69, 525, 10.1042/cs0690525 · DOI
  7. Owen, 1971, J Clin Invest, 50, 1536, 10.1172/JCI106639 · DOI
  8. Wilmore, 1978, Surg Clin North Am, 58, 1173, 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)41685-3 · DOI
  9. Heymsfield, 1985, Cancer, 55, 238, 10.1002/1097-0142(19850101)55:1+<238::AID-CNCR2820551306>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  10. Muller, 1998, Nutrition, 14, 30, 10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00390-0 · DOI

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
McClave, S. A., & Snider, H. L.
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2001-03
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
143-147
ISSN
1363-1950
Cited by
26
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.