Cited by 387Climate Change and Health ImpactsThermoregulation and physiological responsesAir Quality and Health Impacts

Who is Sensitive to Extremes of Temperature?: A Case-Only Analysis

Schwartz, Joel·2005·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extremes of temperature are well known to be associated with excess mortality. Less is known about the characteristics of persons that put them at higher risk, particularly the role of medical conditions. METHODS: To investigate these effects, I used a case-only approach to analyze 160,062 deaths in Wayne County, Michigan, among persons who were 65 years of age or older, who were covered by Medicare, and who had a previous hospital admission for heart and lung disease. Using their unique Medicare identification number, I traced deaths through Medicare hospital admission records to identify primary and secondary diagnoses for all admissions before death. I investigated the role of diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia as modifiers of the risk of dying on an extreme temperature day. Hot days were defined as those greater than the 99th percentile of all days and cold days as those less than the 1st percentile. I also examined the role of sex, age (85 years of age and older), and nonwhite race as modifiers. RESULTS: I found that patients with diabetes had a higher risk of dying on hot days than other subjects (odds ratio=1.17; 95% confidence interval=1.04-1.32). Persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had elevated risks of dying on cold days (1.19; 1.07-1.33). Nonwhites had greater risks on both hot (1.22; 1.09-1.37) and cold (1.25; 1.12-1.40) days, and women had elevated risks on cold days (1.14; 1.02-1.26). The other conditions conveyed no higher risks than average. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics and medical conditions can increase the likelihood of death associated with temperature extremes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ede.0000147114.25957.71

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schwartz, Joel
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2005-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
67-72
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147490300
Cited by
387
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES0002, P30ES000002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
temperature extremes, heat-related mortality, cold-related mortality, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, sex differences, racial disparities, older adults, Medicare beneficiaries, hospitalization, sociodemographic risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Chronic Disease, Demography, Environmental Exposure, Female, Health Status, Heart Diseases, Humans, Lung Diseases, Male, Michigan, Risk Factors, Seasons, Socioeconomic Factors, Temperature, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review