Cited by 34Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm CareAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Birth by caesarean section and school performance in Swedish adolescents- a population-based study

Open access
Curran, Eileen A., Kenny, Louise C., Dalman, Christina, Kearney, Patricia M., Cryan, John F., Dinan, Timothy G., Khashan, Ali S·2017·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the impact of obstetric mode of delivery, and in particular birth by Caesarean section (CS), on school performance in adolescents using a large, population-based cohort. METHODS: We extracted data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and National School Register. We included all live singleton births in Sweden from 1982-1995 (n = 1,489,925). School grades were reported on a scale from 0 to 320, scores less than 160 (i.e. "pass") were considered to be "poor school performance." Mode of delivery was categorised as: unassisted vaginal delivery (VD), assisted VD, elective CS and emergency CS. We measured the association between mode of delivery and "poor school performance" using logistic regression. We then used quantile regression to assess the association between mode of delivery and school performance across the distribution of scores. We adjusted for maternal age, parity, small and large for gestational age, gestational age, maternal country of birth, maternal depression, non-affective disorder or bipolar disorder, parental income at time of birth, and parental social welfare at time of birth. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to investigate the association further. RESULTS: With logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of assisted VD and poor school performance, compared to unassisted VD, was 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03-1.08). For elective CS it was 1.06 (95% CI:1.03-1.09) and for emergency CS it was 1.12 (95% CI: 1.09-1.15). With quantile regression, assisted VD showed little difference in scores, when compared to unassisted VD, at any point across the distribution. Elective CS was associated with a 1-3 point decrease in scores, and emergency CS was associated with a 2-5 point decrease in scores. CONCLUSION: A slight association was found between birth by CS and school performance. However, the effect was quite small and given the complex nature of the relationship, should be interpreted with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-017-1304-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There appears to be a minor correlation between C-section delivery and poor school performance in adolescents.

    “there appears to be a minor correlation between C-section delivery and poor school performance in adolescents (Curran et al., 2017).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Curran et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]Li J, Alterman T, Deddins JA. Analysis of large hierarchical data with multilevel logistic modeling using PROC GLIMMIX. [cited 2016 May 18] Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi31/151-31.pdf.
  2. [37]Thomas J, Hildingsson I. Sweden. In: Kennedy P, Kodate N, editors. Maternity Services and Policy in an International Context: Risk, Citizenship and Welfare Regimes: Routledge; 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curran, E. A., Kenny, L. C., Dalman, C., Kearney, P. M., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., & Khashan, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Khashan, Ali S
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
121-121
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605714845
Cited by
34
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (12|RC|2272)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
cesarean section, mode of delivery, academic performance, adolescents, instrumental delivery, elective cesarean section, emergency cesarean section, birth outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude to Health, Cesarean Section, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Students, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review