Cited by 146Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsSinusitis and nasal conditions

Breath Actuated Device Improves Delivery to Target Sites Beyond the Nasal Valve

Djupesland, Per Gisle, Skretting, Arne, Winderen, Mette, Holand, Trond·2006·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to compare nasal deposition patterns achieved with a conventional hand actuated spray pump and a novel breath actuated bidirectional prototype device housing the same spray pump (OptiMist™, OptiNose AS, Oslo, Norway). Study Design and Methods: The bidirectional delivery device exploits the posterior connection between the nasal passages persisting when the velum automatically closes during oral exhalation. The deposition and clearance patterns achieved with the two devices were compared in nine healthy subjects by scintigraphy after administration of 99m Tc‐aerosols. Results: Compared with traditional spray pump delivery, the OptiMist device provided significantly (P < .004) larger initial and cumulative deposition (area under the deposition vs. time curve) in the upper posterior segment of the nasal passage, housing the sinus ostia and the olfactory region, and significantly lower deposition (P < .004) in the anterior segment, lined by nonciliated squamous epithelium. Furthermore, intersubject reproducibility of the initial and cumulative deposition was higher for the OptiMist™ device both in the upper posterior segment and the entire nose. Conclusions: Compared with a spray pump, the novel breath actuated bidirectional device provides significantly larger deposition in the clinically important regions beyond the nasal valve and reduced anterior deposition. These striking differences provide new opportunities for improved therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis and polyposis as well as extended use of the nose for delivery of drugs from the nose into the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000199741.08517.99

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djupesland, P. G., Skretting, A., Winderen, M., & Holand, T.
Affiliations
OptiNose (Norway) (NO)
Corresponding author
Djupesland, Per Gisle
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
466-472
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2081374067
Cited by
146
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
intranasal drug delivery, nasal valve, scintigraphy, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Aerosols, Aged, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Cavity, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Radionuclide Imaging, Reference Values, Respiration, Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review