The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The focus of this review is outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Recent literature relating to pathophysiology, neuropsychological outcome, and the persistent postconcussion syndrome will be integrated into the existing literature. RECENT FINDINGS: The MTBI literature is enormous, complex, methodologically flawed, and controversial. There have been dozens of studies relating to pathophysiology, neuropsychological outcome, and the postconcussion syndrome during the past year. Two major reviews have been published. Some of the most interesting prospective research has been done with athletes. SUMMARY: The cognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae are self-limiting and reasonably predictable. Mild traumatic brain injuries are characterized by immediate physiological changes conceptualized as a multilayered neurometabolic cascade in which affected cells typically recover, although under certain circumstances a small number might degenerate and die. The primary pathophysiologies include ionic shifts, abnormal energy metabolism, diminished cerebral blood flow, and impaired neurotransmission. During the first week after injury the brain undergoes a dynamic restorative process. Athletes typically return to pre-injury functioning (assessed using symptom ratings or brief neuropsychological measures) within 2-14 days. Trauma patients usually take longer to return to their pre-injury functioning. In these patients recovery can be incomplete and can be complicated by preexisting psychiatric or substance abuse problems, poor general health, concurrent orthopedic injuries, or comorbid problems (e.g. chronic pain, depression, substance abuse, life stress, unemployment, and protracted litigation).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K. (1997) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.445 · Cited by 2,709
Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-analysis of MRI studies
Videbech, P., & Ravnkilde, B. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1957 · Cited by 1,590
Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density
Apkarian, A. V., Sosa, Y., Sonty, S., Levy, R. M., Harden, R. N., Parrish, T. B., & Gitelman, D. R. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2541-04.2004 · Cited by 1,434
Carroll, L., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., & Pépin, M. (2004) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501960410023859 · Cited by 1,326
Frazier, T. W., Demaree, H. A., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.543 · Cited by 792
Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991
D. M. SOSIN, J. E. S. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596124719 · Cited by 594
MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 2. Findings in neuropsychiatric disorders
Geuze, E., Vermetten, E., & Bremner, J. D. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001579 · Cited by 412
Persistence of cognitive effects after withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine use: a meta-analysis
Barker, M. (2004) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/s0887-6177(03)00096-9 · Cited by 307
A quantitative review of cognitive deficits in depression and Alzheimer-type dementia
CHRISTENSEN, H., GRIFFITHS, K., MACKINNON, A., & JACOMB, P. (1997) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617797006310 · Cited by 299
Schulz, K. P., Fan, J., Tang, C. Y., Newcorn, J. H., Buchsbaum, M. S., Cheung, A. M., & Halperin, J. M. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1650 · Cited by 262
Cited by
Recurrent Concussion and Risk of Depression in Retired Professional Football Players
GUSKIEWICZ, K. M., MARSHALL, S. W., BAILES, J., MCCREA, M., HARDING, H. P., MATTHEWS, A., MIHALIK, J. R., & CANTU, R. C. (2007) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180383da5 · Cited by 928
Epidemiology of Postconcussion Syndrome in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Barlow, K. M., Crawford, S., Stevenson, A., Sandhu, S. S., Belanger, F., & Dewey, D. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0925 · Cited by 573
Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents
Wilde, E. A., McCauley, S. R., Hunter, J. V., Bigler, E. D., Chu, Z., Wang, Z. J., Hanten, G. R., Troyanskaya, M., Yallampalli, R., Li, X., et al. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54 · Cited by 525
Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: review and meta-analysis
Eierud, C., Craddock, R. C., Fletcher, S., Aulakh, M., King-Casas, B., Kuehl, D., & LaConte, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.009 · Cited by 524
Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Wilde, E. A., Whiteneck, G. G., Bogner, J., Bushnik, T., Cifu, D. X., Dikmen, S., French, L., Giacino, J. T., Hart, T., Malec, J. F., et al. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Iverson, G. L.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-317
- ISSN
- 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977440378
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.yco.0000165601.29047.ae
- The paper
- Iverson, G. L. (2005). Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000165601.29047.ae
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
