Cited by 147Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time to Trust: Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships and Entrustable Professional Activities

Hirsh, David A., Holmboe, Eric S., ten Cate, Olle·2014·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Medical education shaped by the learning sciences can better serve medical students, residents, faculty, health care institutions, and patients. With increasing innovation in undergraduate and graduate medical education and more focused attention on educational principles and how people learn, this era of educational transformation offers promise. Principles manifest in "educational continuity" are informing changes in educational structures and venues and are enriching new discourse in educational pedagogy, assessment, and scholarship. The articles by Myhre and colleagues and Woloschuk and colleagues in this issue, along with mounting evidence preceding these works, should reassure that principle-driven innovation in medical education is not only possible but can be achieved safely. In this commentary, the authors draw from these works and the wider literature on longitudinal integrated educational design. They suggest that the confluences of movements for longitudinal integrated clerkships and entrustable professional activities open new possibilities for other educational and practice advancements in quality and safety. With the advent of competency-based education, explicit milestones, and improved assessment regimens, overseers will increasingly evaluate students, trainees, and other learners on their ability rather than relying solely on time spent in an activity. The authors suggest that, for such oversight to have the most value, assessors and learners need adequate oversight time, and redesign of educational models will serve this operational imperative. As education leaders are reassessing old medical school and training models, rotational blocks, and other barriers to progress, the authors explore the dynamic interplay between longitudinal integrated learning models and entrustment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000000111

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kerr, 2011, Can Fam Physician, 57, 1355

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Hirsh, D. A., Holmboe, E. S., & ten Cate, O.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Corresponding author
Hirsh, David A.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2014-02
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
201-204
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312402975
Cited by
147
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
longitudinal integrated clerkship, entrustable professional activities, competency-based medical education, educational continuity, learning sciences, medical education reform, trainee assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time to Trust: Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships and Entrustable Professional Activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0000000000000111
The paper
Hirsh, D. A., Holmboe, E. S., & ten Cate, O. (2014). Time to Trust: Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships and Entrustable Professional Activities. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000111