Cited by 31Diversity and Career in MedicineInnovations in Medical EducationGender Diversity and Inequality

Gender differences in leadership amongst first-year medical students in the small-group setting

Wayne, Nancy L., Vermillion, Michelle, Uijtdehaage, Sebastian·2010·Academic Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the extent of gender bias in the volunteerism of small-group leaders amongst first-year medical students, and whether bias could be eliminated with special instructions to the students. METHOD: The gender of leaders in small-group sessions in a real academic setting was monitored under two conditions: control conditions, in which basic instructions were provided to participants, and intervention conditions, in which the same basic instructions were provided plus a brief "pep talk" on the importance of experiencing a leadership role in a safe environment. During the small-group sessions, an observer noted the gender and names of group leaders for later analysis. After a class debriefing, a subset of leaders and nonleaders from both the control and intervention groups were invited to be interviewed about their perceptions of the small-group experience. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed for analysis. RESULTS: In 2007-2008 and 2008-2009, disproportionately fewer women than men volunteered to become small-group leaders under control conditions. This gender bias was eliminated under intervention conditions. The interviews illustrated how a subtle change in instructions helped some female students take on a leadership role. CONCLUSIONS: Gender bias in leadership in the small-group setting amongst medical students-even when women make up half of the class-may persist without targeted intervention. The authors suggest that frequent and consistent intervention during medical school could be an important factor in encouraging women to identify themselves as leaders, promoting confidence to consider leadership roles in medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181e5f2ce

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In medical leadership, a message encouraging medical students without leadership experience to volunteer to lead by stating that the small group provided a 'safe' environment to practice leadership significantly increased the number of groups choosing female leaders.

    “In the field of medical leadership, a message designed to encourage medical students without leadership experience to volunteer to lead their workgroup by stating that the small group provided a”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Wayne, Vermillion, & Uijtdehaage, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wayne, N. L., Vermillion, M., & Uijtdehaage, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Wayne, Nancy L.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2010-08
Volume
85
Issue
8
Pages
1276-1281
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068154623
Cited by
31
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
gender bias, leadership, small group learning, first-year medical students, women in medicine, volunteering, leadership interventions, medical education, student perceptions
MeSH terms
Workforce, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Leadership, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Schools, Medical, Sex Factors, Students, Medical, United States, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review