Cited by 84Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDiabetes Management and Research

Glucose control in the ICU

Open access
Gunst, Jan, De Bruyn, Astrid, Van den Berghe, Greet·2019·Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Critically ill patients usually develop hyperglycemia, which is associated with adverse outcome. Controversy exists whether the relationship is causal or not. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding glucose control in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite promising effects of tight glucose control in pioneer randomized controlled trials, the benefit has not been confirmed in subsequent multicenter studies and one trial found potential harm. This discrepancy could be explained by methodological differences between the trials rather than by a different case mix. Strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of tight glucose control have been developed, including the use of computerized treatment algorithms. SUMMARY: The ideal blood glucose target remains unclear and may depend on the context. As compared with tolerating severe hyperglycemia, tight glucose control is well tolerated and effective in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition when provided with a protocol that includes frequent, accurate glucose measurements and avoids large glucose fluctuations. All patient subgroups potentially benefit, with the possible exception of patients with poorly controlled diabetes, who may need less aggressive glucose control. It remains unclear whether tight glucose control is beneficial or not in the absence of early parenteral nutrition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aco.0000000000000706

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tight glucose control is feasible in patients receiving parenteral nutrition if a strict protocol is followed.

    “Tight glucose control is feasible in patients receiving parenteral nutrition if a strict protocol is followed [29].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Conclusion states that tight glucose control is safe and effective in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition when accurate monitoring and a reliable insulin protocol are provided. That supports feasibility under those conditions, but the citing sentence omits the early-feeding and accurate-monitoring qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]31. Gunst J, Van den Berghe G. Tight glycemic control in critically ill children. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:e48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunst, J., De Bruyn, A., & Van den Berghe, G.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Published
2019-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
156-162
ISSN
0952-7907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911949585
Cited by
84
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (T003617N, C24/17/070)
  • Vlaamse regering (METH/14/06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
tight glycemic control, hyperglycemia, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, glycemic targets, early parenteral nutrition, glucose fluctuations, diabetes mellitus, adverse outcomes
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Critical Care, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Intensive Care Units, Severity of Illness Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Critical Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review