Cited by 1,009Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients

Open access
The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether hypoglycemia leads to death in critically ill patients is unclear. METHODS: We examined the associations between moderate and severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose, 41 to 70 mg per deciliter [2.3 to 3.9 mmol per liter] and ≤40 mg per deciliter [2.2 mmol per liter], respectively) and death among 6026 critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Patients were randomly assigned to intensive or conventional glucose control. We used Cox regression analysis with adjustment for treatment assignment and for baseline and postrandomization covariates. RESULTS: Follow-up data were available for 6026 patients: 2714 (45.0%) had moderate hypoglycemia, 2237 of whom (82.4%) were in the intensive-control group (i.e., 74.2% of the 3013 patients in the group), and 223 patients (3.7%) had severe hypoglycemia, 208 of whom (93.3%) were in the intensive-control group (i.e., 6.9% of the patients in this group). Of the 3089 patients who did not have hypoglycemia, 726 (23.5%) died, as compared with 774 of the 2714 with moderate hypoglycemia (28.5%) and 79 of the 223 with severe hypoglycemia (35.4%). The adjusted hazard ratios for death among patients with moderate or severe hypoglycemia, as compared with those without hypoglycemia, were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 1.62; P<0.001) and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.59 to 2.77; P<0.001), respectively. The association with death was increased among patients who had moderate hypoglycemia on more than 1 day (>1 day vs. 1 day, P=0.01), those who died from distributive (vasodilated) shock (P<0.001), and those who had severe hypoglycemia in the absence of insulin treatment (hazard ratio, 3.84; 95% CI, 2.37 to 6.23; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, intensive glucose control leads to moderate and severe hypoglycemia, both of which are associated with an increased risk of death. The association exhibits a dose-response relationship and is strongest for death from distributive shock. However, these data cannot prove a causal relationship. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; NICE-SUGAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00220987.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1204942

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the surgical ICU, earlier studies found that intensive glucose control at 80 to 110 mg/dL inconsistently reduced length of stay.

    “In the surgical ICU, earlier studies have indicated that intensive glucose control (80 to 110 mg/dL) inconsistently resulted in decreased length of stay.94–96”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Study Participants section describes an intensive glucose target of 81–108 mg/dL, close to the cited 80–110 mg/dL range. The introductory passage on p. 1109 says initial trials suggested a mortality benefit in surgical ICU patients that subsequent trials did not confirm, but it does not say earlier studies found inconsistent reductions in length of stay. The Clinical Course and Hypoglycemia section discusses length of stay by hypoglycemia status, not that claimed treatment effect. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The NICE-SUGAR study showed that more aggressive ICU glucose targets of 81 to 108 mg/dL compared with a conventional target below 180 mg/dL did not change length of stay, days needing mechanical ventilation, or need for renal replacement therapy.

    “The Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation study showed that more aggressive glucose targets of 81 to 108 mg/dL compared with a conventional glucose target (<180 mg/dL) in the ICU did not change length of stay, number of days needing mechanical ventilation, or need for renal replacement therapy.95”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [95]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In NICE-SUGAR, the intensively controlled group had increased mortality and higher rates of hypoglycemia.

    “However, the intensively controlled group had increased mortality and higher rates of hypoglycemia.95,97”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]26. Hill AB. The environment and dis- ease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:295-300.
  2. [27]27. Adler GK, Bonyhay I, Failing H, Waring E, Dotson S, Freeman R. Antecedent hy- poglycemia impairs autonomic cardio- vascular function: implications for rigor- ous glycemic control. Diabetes 2009;58: 360-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators
Affiliations
The George Institute for Global Health (AU)
Corresponding author
The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-09-20
Volume
367
Issue
12
Pages
1108-1118
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1708450707
Cited by
1,009
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 17
FWCI
76.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
hypoglycemia, critically ill patients, mortality, tight glycemic control, blood glucose, insulin therapy, sepsis, intensive care unit, glucose-lowering therapy, septic shock, distributive shock, mortality risk factors, randomized controlled trials, sepsis mortality, vasopressor requirement
MeSH terms
Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Risk, Proportional Hazards Models, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review