Cited by 39Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Nonmedical use of stimulants is associated with riskier sexual practices and other forms of impulsivity

Open access
Grant, Jon E., Redden, Sarah A., Lust, Katherine, Chamberlain, Samuel R.·2018·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to examine the occurrence of the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (amphetamines and methylphenidate) in a university sample and their associated physical and mental health correlates, including potential relationships with risky sexual practices. METHODS: A 156-item anonymous online survey was distributed via e-mail to a sample of 9449 university students. Current use of alcohol and drugs, psychological and physical status, and academic performance were assessed, along with questionnaire-based measures of impulsivity and compulsivity. RESULTS: A total of 3421 participants (59.7% female) were included in the analysis. 6.7% of the sample reported current/recent nonmedical use of prescription stimulants, while an additional 5.8% reported misuse in the past. Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants was associated with lower grade point averages, and with taking a broad range of other drugs (including alcohol, nicotine, illicit substances, and consumption of caffeinated soft drinks). Nonmedical use of stimulants was also significantly associated with impulsivity (Barratt scale), prior treatment for substance use problems, and elevated occurrence of disordered gambling, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety; but not depression symptoms or binge-eating disorder (though it was associated with using drugs to lose weight). The relationship with probable attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on screening was not significant but was numerically elevated. Finally, those using nonmedical prescribed stimulants were significantly more sexually active (including at a younger age), and were less likely to use barrier contraception. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants is common in young adults and has profound public health associations including with a profundity of other drug use (licit and illicit), certain mental health diagnoses (especially gambling, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder ), worse scholastic performance, and riskier sexual practices. The majority of people with nonmedical use of prescription stimulants do not have ADHD, and its link with current ADHD symptoms was less marked than for certain other disorders. Clinicians should screen for the misuse of prescription stimulants as they may be associated with a range of problematic behaviors. Risk of diversion (which may be higher for those living in shared accommodation and those with substance use disorder history) merits careful assessment before prescribing stimulant medication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000448

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, J. E., Redden, S. A., Lust, K., & Chamberlain, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Jon E.
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2018-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
474-480
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W2886024146
Cited by
39
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • Wellcome Trust (110,049/Z/15/Z, /Z/15/Z, 110049)
  • University of Oxford
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
amphetamine, methylphenidate, stimulant abuse, sexual risk behavior, impulsivity, compulsivity, university students, academic performance, gambling addiction, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, barrier contraception, polydrug use, screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amphetamines, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Methylphenidate, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Students, Universities, Midwestern United States, Young Adult, Prescription Drug Misuse, Prescription Drug Diversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review