Cited by 40Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The latent structure and predictors of non-medical prescription drug use and prescription drug use disorders: a national study

Open access
Blanco, Carlos, Rafful, Claudia, Wall, Melanie M., Jin, Chelsea J., Kerridge, Bradley, Schwartz, Robert P.·2013·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Despite growing concerns about non-medical prescription drug use and prescription drug use disorders, whether vulnerability for these conditions is drug-specific or occurs through a shared liability and common risk factors is unknown.Methods Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of Wave 1 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions were used to examine the latent structure of non-medical prescription drug use and prescription drug use disorders. Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) analysis was used to examine whether the effect of sociodemographic and psychiatric covariates occurred through the latent factor, directly on each drug class or both.Results A one-factor model described well the structure of both non-medical prescription drug use and prescription drug use disorders. Younger age, being White, having more intense pain or one of several psychiatric disorders increased the risk of non-medical prescription drug use through the latent factor. The same covariates, except for anxiety disorders also significantly increased the risk of prescription drug use disorders through the latent factor. Older age directly increased the risk of non-medical use of sedatives, and alcohol use disorders decreased the risk of non-medical tranquilizer use. No covariates had direct effects on the risk of any prescription drug use disorders beyond their effect through the latent factor.Conclusion The risk for non-medical prescription drug use and prescription drug use disorders occurs through a shared liability. Treatment, prevention and policy approaches directed at these drugs as a group maybe more effective than those focused on individual classes of drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.07.011

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Younger age, white race, chronic pain, and psychiatric comorbidities are associated with general substance misuse, while older age is linked to sedative misuse.

    “Younger age, white race, chronic pain, and psychiatric comorbidities are associated with general substance misuse, while older age is linked to sedative misuse.”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (§3.2) link younger age, White race, more intense pain, and several psychiatric disorders to non-medical prescription drug use through a common latent factor. They also link older age specifically to non-medical sedative use. The claim broadens the first finding to substance misuse generally and describes pain as chronic, neither of which this passage establishes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanco, C., Rafful, C., Wall, M. M., Jin, C. J., Kerridge, B., & Schwartz, R. P.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Friends Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Blanco, Carlos
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
133
Issue
2
Pages
473-479
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033122092
Cited by
40
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082773, MH076051, R01MH076051, MH082773)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA019606, R01DA023973, DA023200, R01DA019606, DA023973, K02DA023200)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA133050, R01CA133050)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
nonmedical prescription drug use, shared liability, latent structure, mental illness, pain, sedatives, tranquilizers, alcoholism, anxiety disorders, sociodemographic risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcoholism, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analgesics, Opioid, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Methamphetamine, Pain, Pain Measurement, Anti-Anxiety Agents, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Prescription Drug Misuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review