Cited by 39Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy For Chronic Pain: Results From a Clinical Demonstration Project in Primary Care Behavioral Health

Beehler, Gregory P., Murphy, Jennifer L., King, Paul R., Dollar, Katherine M., Kearney, Lisa K., Haslam, Aaron, Wade, Michael, Goldstein, Wade R.·2019·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives: Although cognitive behavioral therapy is an effective intervention for chronic pain, it is a lengthy treatment typically applied only in specialty care settings. The aim of this project was to collect preliminary effectiveness data for Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (Brief CBT-CP), an abbreviated, modular form of treatment designed for use in primary care. Methods: A clinical demonstration project was conducted in which Brief CBT-CP was delivered to primary care patients by 22 integrated care providers practicing in the Primary Care Behavioral Health model of Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. Brief measures were used at each appointment to collect patient-reported clinical outcomes. Results: One hundred eighteen patients provided sufficient data for analysis (male, 75%; mean age, 51.4 y). Multilevel modeling suggested that a composite measure of pain intensity and functional limitations showed statistically significant improvements by the third appointment (Cohen’s d =0.65). Pain-related self-efficacy outcomes showed a similar pattern of results but of smaller effect size (Cohen’s d =0.22). The exploratory analysis identified that Brief CBT-CP modules addressing psychoeducation and goal setting, pacing, and relaxation training were associated with the most significant gains in treatment outcomes. Discussion: These findings provide early support for the effectiveness of Brief CBT-CP when delivered by providers in every day Primary Care Behavioral Health settings. Results are discussed in relation to the need for additional research regarding the potential value of employing safe, population-based, nonpharmacological approaches to pain management in primary care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000747

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beehler, G. P., Murphy, J. L., King, P. R., Dollar, K. M., Kearney, L. K., Haslam, A., Wade, M., & Goldstein, W. R.
Affiliations
  • VA Western New York Healthcare System (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Syracuse VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Raymond G. Murphy VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Beehler, Gregory P.
  • King, Paul R.
  • Haslam, Aaron
  • Goldstein, Wade R.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2019-10
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
809-817
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2958476193
Cited by
39
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
brief cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, primary care, primary care behavioral health, veterans, pain intensity, functional limitations, pacing, relaxation training, psychoeducation, goal setting, non-pharmacological pain management, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review