Cited by 4Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health InterventionsPain Management and Treatment

The timing and magnitude of improvements in depression, anxiety, disability, and pain intensity during an internet-delivered program for chronic pain

Open access
Bisby, Madelyne A., Chandra, Shianika S., Scott, Amelia J., Dudeney, Joanne, Titov, Nickolai, Dear, Blake F.·2023·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Numerous studies have found that pain management programs are an effective treatment option for people with chronic pain. However, little is known about when people experience improvements during these programs and why they are effective. Using a secondary analysis, the current study examined the timing and magnitude of symptom change during an 8-week internet-delivered psychological pain management program for people with chronic pain. The change in 4 outcomes was examined: depression (n = 881), anxiety (n = 561), disability (n = 484), and pain intensity (n = 484). The largest improvements in depression, anxiety, and disability were reported during the first half of treatment (ie, 4 weeks), whereas the largest reductions in pain intensity were reported during the second half of treatment. Half the participants had experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in depression or anxiety, and a third of participants had reported such an improvement in disability by midtreatment (ie, 5 weeks after baseline). In a subgroup analysis (n = 397), this pattern of change in depression and anxiety symptoms did not differ based on the level of therapist guidance. This study highlights the importance of the first few weeks of psychological pain management programs and encourages future work to examine how the mechanisms underpinning rapid change may be harnessed to optimize care for people with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study found that depression, anxiety, and disability improved rapidly during the first half of an 8-week internet-delivered pain management program, and most of the prepost change had occurred by midtreatment. This work highlights the therapeutic potential of the first few treatment sessions and prompts future research into a rapid responding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.06.004

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical improvements were comparable within the treatment conditions of RCT2 and RCT3, so the treatment conditions were considered equal and amalgamated into one Treatment group per RCT.

    “Analyses showed clinical improvements were comparable within the treatment conditions of both RCTs.Accordingly, the treatment conditions were considered equal and amalgamated into one 'Treatment' group per RCT for the purpose of this study and previously published studies.41,42”

    From Internet-Delivered Psychological Pain-Management for Young Adults With Chronic Pain: An Investigation of Clinical Trial Data (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Participants section (page unavailable) says treatment participants from three prior RCTs received the same course and were collapsed into a single sample. The Conclusions section reports no significant difference in the timing of depression and anxiety improvement across guidance conditions. The paper does not say that conditions within RCT2 and RCT3 were deemed equal and amalgamated into one Treatment group per RCT, or that this was done in previously published studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bisby, M. A., Chandra, S. S., Scott, A. J., Dudeney, J., Titov, N., & Dear, B. F.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1968-1979
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383879242
Cited by
4
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, online intervention, psychological pain management, depression, anxiety, disability, pain intensity, symptom change over time, therapist guidance, therapeutic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Pain Measurement, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review