Cited by 175Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxytocin and Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Findings

Rash, Joshua A., Aguirre-Camacho, Aldo, Campbell, Tavis S.·2014·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A review of the literature was conducted to assess the association between oxytocin (OT) and pain. METHODS: PsychInfo, PubMed, and Medline (EBSCO) research databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles written between 1950 and 2012. Of a total of 1166 articles returned, 50 (9 human, 33 animal, and 8 spinal cord samples) met full inclusion criteria and were included in the review. RESULTS: OT had a reliable effect as defined by increasing pain tolerance in 29 of 33 animal studies reviewed. This effect persisted across central and peripheral modes of administration and type of noxious stimulus used (eg, heat, electric). The results suggest that OT acts as an analgesic for acute pain in animals. Preliminary research with humans offers consistent evidence to suggest that OT decreases pain sensitivity, though the reliability and stability of such effects cannot yet be determined. Although the findings are encouraging, there is a need for methodologically rigorous work in humans where OT is administered centrally. DISCUSSION: Further research seems to be warranted as the existence of biologically and psychologically plausible mechanisms linking OT and pain have been well supported using animal models with limited but encouraging human research. Implications and recommendations are discussed. Findings from this research may inform therapeutic methods for the management of pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31829f57df

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Rash, J. A., Aguirre-Camacho, A., & Campbell, T. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2014-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
453-462
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015140100
Cited by
175
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, pain, analgesia, pain tolerance, acute pain, noxious stimuli, thermal pain, animal models, human subjects research, pain management, centralized management
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Oxytocin, Pain, Spinal Cord, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review