The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To promote the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods (intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) and provide contraception at no cost to a large cohort of participants in an effort to reduce unintended pregnancies in our region. METHODS: We enrolled 9,256 adolescents and women at risk for unintended pregnancy into the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a prospective cohort study of adolescents and women desiring reversible contraceptive methods. Participants were recruited from the two abortion facilities in the St. Louis region and through provider referral, advertisements, and word of mouth. Contraceptive counseling included all reversible methods but emphasized the superior effectiveness of LARC methods (IUDs and implants). All participants received the reversible contraceptive method of their choice at no cost. We analyzed abortion rates, the percentage of abortions that were repeat abortions, and teenage births. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in the percentage of abortions that were repeat abortions in the St. Louis region compared with Kansas City and nonmetropolitan Missouri (P<.001). Abortion rates in the CHOICE cohort were less than half the regional and national rates (P<.001). The rate of teenage birth within the CHOICE cohort was 6.3 per 1,000, compared with the U.S. rate of 34.3 per 1,000. CONCLUSION: We noted a clinically and statistically significant reduction in abortion rates, repeat abortions, and teenage birth rates. Unintended pregnancies may be reduced by providing no-cost contraception and promoting the most effective contraceptive methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013 · Cited by 1,291
Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner, B., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Buckel, C., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1110855 · Cited by 1,154
Self-citationUnintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes.
Singh, S., Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2010) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x · Cited by 731
Use of Contraception in the United States, 1982: (605102007-001)
Bachrach, C. A., & Mosher, W. D. (1984) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e605102007-001 · Cited by 689
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017 · Cited by 665
Self-citationContinuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Allsworth, J. E., Petrosky, E., Madden, T., Eisenberg, D., & Secura, G. (2011) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31821188ad · Cited by 564
Self-citationCommittee Opinion No. 539: Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
(2012) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182723b7d · Cited by 382
Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception
Blumenthal, P. D., Voedisch, A., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq026 · Cited by 290
Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Number Needed to Treat
Bender, R. (2001) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00134-3 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Wellings, K., Jones, K. G., Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Clifton, S., Datta, J., Copas, A. J., Erens, B., Gibson, L. J., Macdowall, W., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62071-1 · Cited by 477
Gomez, A. M., Fuentes, L., & Allina, A. (2014) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/46e1614 · Cited by 379
McNicholas, C., Maddipati, R., Zhao, Q., Swor, E., & Peipert, J. F. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000690 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peipert, J. F., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1291-1297
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134275572
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 45.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56
- The paper
- Peipert, J. F., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.