The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE To introduce and promote the use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception (LARC; intrauterine contraceptives and subdermal implant) by removing financial and knowledge barriers. STUDY DESIGN The Contraceptive CHOICE Project is a prospective cohort study of 10,000 women 14-45 years who want to avoid pregnancy for at least one year and are initiating a new form of reversible contraception. Women screened for this study are read a script regarding LARC to increase awareness of these options. Participants choose their contraceptive method that is provided at no cost. We report the contraceptive choice and baseline characteristics of the first 2,500 women enrolled August 2007 through December 2008. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent of women enrolled (95% confidence interval: 65.3, 69.0) chose long-acting methods. Fifty-six percent selected intrauterine contraception and 11% selected the subdermal implant. CONCLUSION Once financial barriers were removed and LARC methods were introduced to all potential participants as a first-line contraceptive option, two-thirds chose LARC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data
Zou, G. (2004) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwh090 · Cited by 9,615
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e414702008-001 · Cited by 956
Factors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004
Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E. (2008) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/4009408 · Cited by 381
Contraceptive Use among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000-2001
Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.2307/3097748 · Cited by 333
Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States
Trussell, J., Lalla, A. M., Doan, Q. V., Reyes, E., Pinto, L., & Gricar, J. (2009) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.08.003 · Cited by 306
Stringer, E. M., Kaseba, C., Levy, J., Sinkala, M., Goldenberg, R. L., Chi, B. H., Matongo, I., Vermund, S. H., Mwanahamuntu, M., & Stringer, J. S. A. (2007) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.031 · Cited by 246
Challenges in Translating Evidence to Practice: The Provision of Intrauterine Contraception
Harper, C. C., Blum, M., de Bocanegra, H. T., Darney, P. D., Speidel, J. J., Policar, M., & Drey, E. A. (2008) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318173fd83 · Cited by 221
Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device
Whitaker, A. K., Johnson, L. M., Harwood, B. J., Chiappetta, L., Creinin, M. D., & Gold, M. A. (2008) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.119 · Cited by 157
Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice
Stanwood, N. L. (2002) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01726-4 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Preventing Unintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception
Peipert, J. F., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56 · Cited by 469
Self-citationGomez, A. M., Fuentes, L., & Allina, A. (2014) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/46e1614 · Cited by 379
Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009
Finer, L. B., Jerman, J., & Kavanaugh, M. L. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027 · Cited by 308
McNicholas, C., Maddipati, R., Zhao, Q., Swor, E., & Peipert, J. F. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000690 · Cited by 97
Self-citationCharyeva, Z., Oguntunde, O., Orobaton, N., Otolorin, E., Inuwa, F., Alalade, O., Abegunde, D., & Danladi, S. (2015) · Global Health: Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00129 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115.e1-115.e7
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021208888
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 30.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017
- The paper
- Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2010). The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
