Cited by 184Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Quality of Life for Patients With Low Back Pain

Díaz-Arribas, María J., Fernández-Serrano, Mónica, Royuela, Ana, Kovacs, Francisco M., Gallego-Izquierdo, Tomás, Ramos-Sánchez, Mabel, Llorca-Palomera, Rosa, Pardo-Hervás, Pedro +1 more·2017·Spine

Abstract

Study Design.: Multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Objective.: To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries of Short Form SF-12 (SF-12), in patients with low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data.: Quality of life is one of the core domains recommended to be assessed in patients with LBP. SF-12 is the most widely used instrument for this purpose, but its MCID was unknown. Methods.: A total of 458 patients with subacute and chronic LBP were consecutively recruited across 21 practices. LBP, referred pain, disability, PCS, and MCS were assessed upon recruitment and 12 months later. Self-reported health status change between baseline and 12 month-assessment, was used as the external criterion. The MCID for SF-12 was estimated following four anchor-based methods; minimal detectable change (MDC); average change (AC); change difference (CD); and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), for which the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The effect on MCID values of pain duration and baseline scores was assessed. Results.: Values for PCS were: MDC: 0.56, AC: 2.71, CD: 3.29, and ROC: 1.14. Values for MCS were: MDC: 3.77, AC: 3.54, CD: 1.13, and ROC: 4.23. AUC values were <0.7; MCID values were smaller among chronic patients and those with better baseline quality of life. Conclusion.: Different methods for MCID calculation lead to different results. In patients with subacute and chronic LBP, improvements >3.77 in MCS and >3.29 in PCS, can be considered clinically relevant. MCID is smaller in patients with longer pain duration and better baseline quality of life. Level of Evidence: 2

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0000000000002298

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Díaz-Arribas, M. J., Fernández-Serrano, M., Royuela, A., Kovacs, F. M., Gallego-Izquierdo, T., Ramos-Sánchez, M., Llorca-Palomera, R., Pardo-Hervás, P., & Martín-Pariente, O. S.
Affiliations
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Nurse and Physical Therapy Department. University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
  • Spanish Back Pain Research Network
Corresponding author
  • Kovacs, Francisco M.
  • Llorca-Palomera, Rosa
Venue
Spine
Published
2017-12-15
Volume
42
Issue
24
Pages
1908-1916
ISSN
  • 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1159
OpenAlex
W2724099969
Cited by
184
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
minimal clinically important difference, low back pain, quality of life, SF-12, physical component summary, mental component summary, anchor-based methods, minimal detectable change, receiver operating characteristic, subacute low back pain, chronic low back pain, pain duration, baseline quality of life
MeSH terms
Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Conservative Treatment, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, ROC Curve, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Area Under Curve, Self Report, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review