Cited by 67Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentEmergency and Acute Care StudiesAcute Kidney Injury Research

Hospital-based acute care use in survivors of septic shock.

Open access
Ortego, Alexandra, Gaieski, David F., Fuchs, Barry D., Jones, Tiffanie, Halpern, Scott D., Small, Dylan S., Sante, S. Cham, Drumheller, Byron +2 more·2015·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Septic shock is associated with increased long-term morbidity and mortality. However, little is known about the use of hospital-based acute care in survivors after hospital discharge. The objectives of the study were to examine the frequency, timing, causes, and risk factors associated with emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary, academic hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients admitted with septic shock (serum lactate≥4 mmol/L or refractory hypotension) and discharged alive to a nonhospice setting between 2007 and 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The coprimary outcomes were all-cause hospital readmission and emergency department visits (treat-and-release encounters) within 30 days to any of the three health system hospitals. Of 269 at-risk survivors, 63 (23.4%; 95% CI, 18.2-28.5) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge and another 12 (4.5%; 95% CI, 2.3-7.7) returned to the emergency department for a treat-and-release visit. Readmissions occurred within 15 days of discharge in 75% of cases and were more likely in oncology patients (p=0.001) and patients with a longer hospital length of stay (p=0.04). Readmissions were frequently due to another life-threatening condition and resulted in death or discharge to hospice in 16% of cases. The reasons for readmission were deemed potentially related to the index septic shock hospitalization in 78% (49 of 63) of cases. The most common cause was infection related, accounting for 46% of all 30-day readmissions, followed by cardiovascular or thromboembolic events (18%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of hospital-based acute care appeared to be common in septic shock survivors. Encounters often led to readmission within 15 days of discharge, were frequently due to another acute condition, and appeared to result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Given the potential public health implications of these findings, validation studies are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000693

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many sepsis survivors experience short and/or long-term sequelae such as cognitive and/or physical disability, with ongoing recovery persisting for months to years.

    “Many sepsis survivors experience short and/or longterm sequela such as cognitive and/or physical disability, with ongoing recovery persisting for months to years (620).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [620]

    The introductory passage following the Abstract > Conclusions says sepsis survivorship is associated with cognitive and physical impairments, and the Discussion describes possible functional impairments and a path to recovery. Neither passage establishes that recovery continues for months to years; this study focuses on hospital-based acute care after discharge. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sepsis is associated with newly acquired cognitive impairment and functional disability amongst survivors.

    “Sepsis is associated with newly acquired cognitive impairment and functional disability amongst survivors (620).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [620]

    The introductory passage (indexed under Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable) states that sepsis survivorship is associated with cognitive and physical impairments. The Discussion mentions possible new or progressive functional impairments, but does not establish that the cognitive impairment and functional disability are newly acquired; it says that possibility requires direct examination. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sepsis survivors are at risk for hospital readmission, which has been associated with increased mortality or discharge to hospice.

    “Sepsis survivors are at risk for hospital readmission, which has been associated with increased mortality or discharge to hospice [622, 623].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Elixhauser A Steiner C Readmissions to U.S. hospital by diagnosis, 2010 HCUP Statistical Brief #161 4 2013 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb153.pdf 24006550
  2. [49]Sutton J Friedman B Trends in septicemia hospitalizations and readmissions in selected HCUP states, 2005 and 2010 HCUP Statistical Brief #161 9 2013 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb161.pdf 24228290

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortego, A., Gaieski, D. F., Fuchs, B. D., Jones, T., Halpern, S. D., Small, D. S., Sante, S. C., Drumheller, B., Christie, J. D., & Mikkelsen, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Geisinger College of Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-04
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
729-737
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312765923
Cited by
67
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (L30 HL115698)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (L30 GM086101)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
septic shock, 30-day readmission, emergency department visits, risk factors for readmission, length of hospital stay, cancer patients, mortality
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Septic, United States, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review