Cited by 56Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHospital Admissions and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Does early follow-up improve the outcomes of sepsis survivors discharged to home health care?

Open access
Deb, Partha, Murtaugh, Christopher M., Bowles, Kathryn H., Mikkelsen, Mark E., Khajavi, Hoda Nouri, Moore, Stanley, Barrón, Yolanda, Feldman, Penny H.·2019·Medical Care

Abstract

Background: There is little evidence to guide the care of over a million sepsis survivors following hospital discharge despite high rates of hospital readmission. Objective: We examined whether early home health nursing (first visit within 2 days of hospital discharge and at least 1 additional visit in the first posthospital week) and early physician follow-up (an outpatient visit in the first posthospital week) reduce 30-day readmissions among Medicare sepsis survivors. Design: A pragmatic, comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare data from 2013 to 2014 using nonlinear instrumental variable analysis. Subjects: Medicare beneficiaries in the 50 states and District of Columbia discharged alive after a sepsis hospitalization and received home health care. Measures: The outcomes, protocol parameters, and control variables were from Medicare administrative and claim files and the home health Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission. Results: Our sample consisted of 170,571 mostly non-Hispanic white (82.3%), female (57.5%), older adults (mean age, 76 y) with severe sepsis (86.9%) and a multitude of comorbid conditions and functional limitations. Among them, 44.7% received only the nursing protocol, 11.0% only the medical doctor protocol, 28.1% both protocols, and 16.2% neither. Although neither protocol by itself had a statistically significant effect on readmission, both together reduced the probability of 30-day all-cause readmission by 7 percentage points (P=0.006; 95% confidence interval=2, 12). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, together, early postdischarge care by home health and medical providers can reduce hospital readmissions for sepsis survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001152

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies, one RCT and two observational studies, evaluated early post-hospital follow-up in patients with critical illness.

    “Three studies, one RCT (628) and two observational studies (629, 630) evaluated early post-hospital follow-up in patients with critical illness.”
  • Reductions in ICU and ventilator days in intervention patients who died before hospital discharge were found in two studies, and a third study found overall shorter ICU and hospital stay in the ethics consultation group.

    “Reductions in ICU and ventilator days in intervention patients who died before hospital discharge were found in two studies (539, 540), and the third study found overall shorter ICU and hospital stay in the ethics consultation group (541).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [540]

    The Methods (Study Population) describe sepsis patients discharged alive to home health care, and the Results (Control Function Modeling Results) assess post-discharge follow-up and 30-day readmission. Searches for ethics consultation, ventilator days, and ICU or hospital length of stay found no passage addressing the attributed findings. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ethics consultation did not affect overall mortality in any study.

    “Ethics consultation did not affect overall mortality in any study.”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [540]

    The Results section, under “Control Function Modeling Results” (page unavailable), reports that early nursing and physician follow-up did not affect rates of hospice admission or death among sepsis survivors. It does not address ethics consultation or mortality across multiple studies. Searches for “ethics consultation” and related mortality terms found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In an analysis of older adults with severe sepsis, one study found that early home health care combined with a medical provider visit was associated with reduced readmission risk.

    “In an analysis of older adults with severe sepsis, one study found that the combination of early home health care and a visit with a medical provider was associated with a reduced readmission risk [631].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Pennsylvania THaHAo. HAP Sepsis Conference Highlights New Research, Best Practices. 2018; https://www.haponline.org/Newsroom/News/ID/4729/HAP-Sepsis-Conference-Highlights-New-Research-Best-Practices. Accessed February 12, 2019.
  2. [21]Deb P, Norton EC, Manning WG. Health econometrics using Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press; 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deb, P., Murtaugh, C. M., Bowles, K. H., Mikkelsen, M. E., Khajavi, H. N., Moore, S., Barrón, Y., & Feldman, P. H.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • VNS Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Independent Contractor, Bonny Doon, California
Corresponding author
Deb, Partha
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2019-08
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
633-640
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960683087
Cited by
55
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR016014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
sepsis survivors, home health care, home care nursing, physician follow-up, hospital readmission, 30-day readmission, post-discharge care, Medicare beneficiaries, severe sepsis, OASIS
MeSH terms
Aftercare, Aged, Clinical Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Treatment Outcome, Sepsis, Home Health Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review