Cited by 30Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research

Prenatal exposure to mixtures of persistent endocrine-disrupting chemicals and birth size in a population-based cohort of British girls

Open access
Marks, Kristin J., Howards, Penelope P., Smarr, Melissa M., Flanders, W. Dana, Northstone, Kate, Daniel, Johnni H., Sjödin, Andreas, Calafat, Antonia M. +1 more·2021·Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: Previous studies of endocrine-disrupting chemicals have examined one of these chemicals at a time in association with an outcome; studying mixtures better approximates human experience. We investigated the association of prenatal exposure to mixtures of persistent endocrine disruptors (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances [PFAS], polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs], and organochlorine pesticides) with birth size among female offspring in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), based in the United Kingdom in 1991–1992. Methods: We quantified concentrations of 52 endocrine-disrupting chemicals in maternal serum collected during pregnancy at median 15-week gestation. Birth weight, crown-to-heel length, and head circumference were measured at birth; ponderal index and small for gestational age were calculated from these. We used repeated holdout Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression to examine mixtures in 313 mothers. Results: Using WQS regression, all mixtures (each chemical class separately and all three together) were inversely associated with birth weight. A one-unit increase in WQS index (a one-decile increase in chemical concentrations) for all three classes combined was associated with 55 g ( β = −55 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −89, −22 g) lower birth weight. Associations were weaker but still inverse using Bayesian kernel machine regression. Under both methods, PFAS were the most important contributors to the association with birth weight. We also observed inverse associations for crown-to-heel length. Conclusions: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that prenatal exposure to mixtures of persistent endocrine-disrupting chemicals affects birth size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0000000000001351

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp17.pdf. 36888731
  2. [3]Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for DDT, DDE, and DDD. In: Department of Health and Human Services PHS, ed. Atlanta, GA, 2002. 37023235
  3. [21]National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Powering Research through Innovative Methods for mixtures in Epidemiology (PRIME) (R01) RFA-ES-17-001. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-ES-17-001.html. PMC8835015 35162394

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marks, K. J., Howards, P. P., Smarr, M. M., Flanders, W. D., Northstone, K., Daniel, J. H., Sjödin, A., Calafat, A. M., & Hartman, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Marks, Kristin J.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
573-582
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138814018
Cited by
30
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (217065/Z/19/Z, 102215)
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_15018, MC_PC_19009)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, chemical mixtures, prenatal exposure, birth weight, birth size, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, maternal serum, small for gestational age, head circumference, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Child, Environmental Pollutants, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Maternal Exposure, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review