Cited by 42Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyMental Health Research TopicsEating Disorders and Behaviors

A Structural Approach to the Familial Coaggregation of Disorders

Hudson, James I., Javaras, Kristin N., Laird, Nan M., VanderWeele, Tyler J., Pope, Harrison G., Hernán, Miguel A.·2008·Epidemiology

Abstract

The demonstration that 2 disorders coaggregate in families is often the first step in the exploration of genetic factors common to the 2 disorders. Previous methods of analyzing familial coaggregation have used either (1) a typical measure of association (eg, the odds ratio) between a disorder in an individual and another disorder in family members, or (2) a linear structural equation model (SEM). The association method accommodates case-control sampling of families, but may not assess the causal effect of interest because it is not based on an underlying causal model. The SEM method is based on a causal model, but cannot easily accommodate case-control sampling or direct effects of 1 disorder on the other within individuals. We develop a new method of analyzing coaggregation based on directed acyclic graphs. Because this method is a generalization of structural equation models and uses measures of association that accommodate case-control sampling and direct effects, it combines the strengths of both previous methods. In the absence of direct effects between disorders, our approach provides a valid estimate of the causal coaggregation effect. In the presence of direct effects, our approach provides an upper-bound estimate and (assuming additive linear effects of latent familial and nonfamilial factors) a lower-bound estimate of the causal coaggregation effect. For illustration, we applied our method to a family study of binge eating disorder and bipolar disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0b013e31816a9de7

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudson, J. I., Javaras, K. N., Laird, N. M., VanderWeele, T. J., Pope, H. G., & Hernán, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Hudson, James I.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2008-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
431-439
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032755500
Cited by
42
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5 T32 MN17119-22)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070377)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
directed acyclic graphs, structural equation modeling, case-control sampling, causal effect estimation, binge eating disorder, bipolar disorder, genetic factors, family studies
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Bulimia, Family, Humans, Models, Genetic, Research Design, Comorbidity, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review