Cited by 2,096Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Open access
Schisterman, Enrique F., Cole, Stephen R., Platt, Robert W.·2009·Epidemiology

Abstract

Overadjustment is defined inconsistently. This term is meant to describe control (eg, by regression adjustment, stratification, or restriction) for a variable that either increases net bias or decreases precision without affecting bias. We define overadjustment bias as control for an intermediate variable (or a descending proxy for an intermediate variable) on a causal path from exposure to outcome. We define unnecessary adjustment as control for a variable that does not affect bias of the causal relation between exposure and outcome but may affect its precision. We use causal diagrams and an empirical example (the effect of maternal smoking on neonatal mortality) to illustrate and clarify the definition of overadjustment bias, and to distinguish overadjustment bias from unnecessary adjustment. Using simulations, we quantify the amount of bias associated with overadjustment. Moreover, we show that this bias is based on a different causal structure from confounding or selection biases. Overadjustment bias is not a finite sample bias, while inefficiencies due to control for unnecessary variables are a function of sample size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181a819a1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Rothman K Greenland S Modern Epidemiology 1998 2nd ed. Philadelphia Lippincott-Raven

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Schisterman, Enrique F.
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2009-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
488-495
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004722883
Cited by
2,096
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 298 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 38
FWCI
27.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R03AI071763)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Z01HD008761)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
intermediate variables, confounding, selection bias, causal graphs, maternal smoking, neonatal mortality, regression adjustment, stratification, sample size
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Population Dynamics, Smoking, Models, Statistical, Epidemiologic Research Design, Bias, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review