Cited by 69Smoking Behavior and CessationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Relationship between weight status and delay discounting in a sample of adolescent cigarette smokers

Open access
Fields, Sherecce A., Sabet, Mae, Peal, Adam, Reynolds, Brady·2011·Behavioural Pharmacology

Abstract

Obesity and cigarette smoking are often cited separately as the top two preventable causes of death in the United States; however, little research has explored the factors associated with being both obese and a smoker. Delay discounting is a behavioral characteristic that may underlie both of these conditions/behaviors. Delay discounting describes the extent to which an individual discounts the value of an outcome because of a delay in its occurrence. Higher rates of discounting are often considered as an index of impulsivity and have been linked with obesity and cigarette smoking. No research to date has explored delay discounting in a sample of obese smokers. For this study, adolescent smokers classified as obese (body mass index >95th percentile) and healthy weight (body mass index between the 5th and 85th percentiles) were compared on a laboratory assessment of delay discounting. Obese smokers discounted significantly more by delay than healthy weight smokers. This difference remained statistically significant even after controlling for demographic variables that differed across groups. These findings suggest that the relationships between delay discounting and obesity and cigarette smoking may be additive, such that extreme discounting might proportionally increase the risk of becoming an obese smoker. However, future prospective study is needed to fully determine the veracity of this hypothesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/fbp.0b013e328345c855

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fields, S. A., Sabet, M., Peal, A., & Reynolds, B.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Brady
Venue
Behavioural Pharmacology
Published
2011-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
266-268
ISSN
0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061899352
Cited by
69
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA023087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
delay discounting, obesity, impulsivity, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Obesity, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review