Cited by 65Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Copy number variation in the dosage-sensitive 16p11.2 interval accounts for only a small proportion of autism incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Walsh, Kyle M., Bracken, Michael B.·2011·Genetics in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Autism is one of the most heritable complex disorders, but the genetic etiology of autism spectrum disorders is unexplained in ∼ 90% of cases. Highly penetrant microdeletions and microduplications of 16p11.2 contribute to the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder, but the extent to which these variants account for the total burden of idiopathic autism spectrum disorders has not been systematically investigated.Methods A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the prevalence of these variants among individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. A planned subgroup analysis was conducted to assess prevalence differences between sporadic and familial autism spectrum disorder cases.Results In the combined analysis of 3613 idiopathic autism spectrum disorder cases from seven studies, the meta-analytic prevalence of these microdeletions and microduplications was 0.76% (95% CI, 0.51-1.12%). When stratified by copy number variant-type, the prevalence of microdeletions was 0.50% (95% CI, 0.31-0.82%) and the prevalence of microduplications was 0.28% (95% CI, 0.14-0.56%). Sporadic autism spectrum disorder cases showed only a slightly higher prevalence than familial cases.Conclusion The number needed to test to identify one such variant is 132 patients (95% CI, 89-198). Such information, especially as it pertains to diagnostic yield in genetic testing, should prove useful to clinicians considering chromosomal microarray analysis in subjects with autism spectrum disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/gim.0b013e3182076c0c

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHD8 mutation frequency is the highest of all genes screened and nearly matches the frequency of CNVs at 16p11.2, the most frequent recurrent deletion or duplication locus in sporadic ASD.

    “The frequency of mutations in this gene is the highest of all genes screened thus far and nearly matches that of CNVs at 16p11.2, which is the most frequent recurrently deleted (0.5%) or duplicated (0.3%) locus in sporadic ASD [50,51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, K. M., & Bracken, M. B.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
377-384
ISSN
1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982282485
Cited by
65
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, copy number variation, 16p11.2, microdeletion, microduplication, genetic etiology, prevalence, chromosomal microarray analysis, genetic testing yield
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Humans, Incidence, Publication Bias, Gene Dosage, DNA Copy Number Variations, Chromosome Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review