Cited by 38Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary biliary cholangitis drug evaluation and regulatory approval: Where do we go from here?

Open access

Abstract

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease. The management landscape was transformed 20 years ago with the advent of ursodeoxycholic acid. Up to 40% of patients do not, however, respond adequately to ursodeoxycholic acid and therefore still remain at risk of disease progression to cirrhosis. The introduction of obeticholic acid as a second-line therapy for patients failing ursodeoxycholic acid has improved outcomes for patients with PBC. There remains, however, a need for better treatment for patients at higher risk. The greatest threat facing our efforts to improve treatment in PBC is, paradoxically, the regulatory approval model providing conditional marketing authorization for new drugs based on biochemical markers on the condition that long-term, randomized placebo-controlled outcome trials are performed to confirm efficacy. As demonstrated by the COBALT confirmatory study with obeticholic acid, it is difficult to retain patients in the required follow-on confirmatory placebo-controlled PBC outcome trials when a licensed drug is commercially available. New PBC therapies in development, such as the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor agonists, face even greater challenges in demonstrating outcome benefit through randomized placebo-controlled studies once following conditional marketing authorization, as there will be even more treatment options available. A recently published EMA Reflection Paper provides some guidance on the regulatory pathway to full approval but fails to recognize the importance of real-world data in providing evidence of outcome benefit in rare diseases. Here we explore the impact of the EMA reflection paper on PBC therapy and offer pragmatic solutions for generating evidence of long-term outcomes through real-world data collection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hep.0000000000000864

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Dyson, 2016, The inter-relationship of symptom severity and quality of life in 2055 patients with primary biliary cholangitis, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 44, 1039, 10.1111/apt.13794 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Martin, 2022, Liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis, Clin Liver Dis, 26, 765, 10.1016/j.cld.2022.06.014 · DOI
  3. Floreani, 2017, Geoepidemiology and changing mortality in primary biliary cholangitis, J Gastroenterol, 52, 655, 10.1007/s00535-017-1333-2 · DOI
  4. Pells, 2013, The impact of liver transplantation on the phenotype of primary biliary cirrhosis patients in the UK-PBC cohort, J Hepatol, 59, 67, 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.02.019 · DOI
  5. Beuers, 2015, Changing nomenclature for PBC: From ‘cirrhosis’ to ‘cholangitis’, Gastroenterology, 149, 1627, 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.031 · DOI
  6. Parés, 2006, Excellent long-term survival in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid, Gastroenterology, 130, 715, 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.029 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Saffioti, 2017, Pharmacological interventions for primary biliary cholangitis: An attempted network meta-analysis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD011648
  8. Carbone, 2013, Sex and age are determinants of the clinical phenotype of primary biliary cirrhosis and response to ursodeoxycholic acid, Gastroenterology, 144, 560, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Harms, 2020, Number needed to treat with ursodeoxycholic acid therapy to prevent liver transplantation or death in primary biliary cholangitis, Gut, 69, 1502, 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319057 · DOI
  10. Corpechot, 2018, A placebo-controlled trial of bezafibrate in primary biliary cholangitis, N Engl J Med, 378, 2171, 10.1056/NEJMoa1714519 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grigorian, 2015, Fenofibrate is effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: A meta-analysis, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 39, 296, 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Smets, 2021, Improved markers of cholestatic liver injury in patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated with obeticholic acid and bezafibrate, Hepatology, 73, 2598, 10.1002/hep.31613 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Murillo Perez, 2022, Greater transplant-free survival in patients receiving obeticholic acid for primary biliary cholangitis in a clinical trial setting compared to real-world external controls, Gastroenterology, 163, 1630, 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.054 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tanaka, 2021, Association of bezafibrate with transplant-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, J Hepatol, 75, 565, 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hirschfield, 2015, Efficacy of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid, Gastroenterology, 148, 751, 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hirschfield, 2021, A placebo-controlled randomised trial of budesonide for PBC following an insufficient response to UDCA, J Hepatol, 74, 321, 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Neuschwander-Tetri, 2015, Targeting the FXR nuclear receptor to treat liver disease, Gastroenterology, 148, 704, 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.037 · DOI
  18. Laffitte, 2016, A novel, highly potent, non-bile acid FXR agonist for the treatment of NASH and cholestasis, Hepatol Int, 10, S97
  19. Day, 1993, The effect of bezafibrate treatment on serum alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme activities, Metabolism, 42, 839, 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90056-T · DOI
  20. Abbas, 2023, UK-wide multicenter evaluation of second-line therapies in primary biliary cholangitis, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21, 1561, 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.038 · DOI
  21. Hosonuma, 2015, A prospective randomized controlled study of long-term combination therapy using ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and dyslipidemia, Am J Gastroenterol, 110, 423, 10.1038/ajg.2015.20 · DOI · Paper page
  22. John, 2021, Impact of obeticholic acid exposure on decompensation and mortality in primary biliary cholangitis and cirrhosis, Hepatol Commun, 5, 1426, 10.1002/hep4.1720 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Cheung, 2016, Combined ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and fenofibrate in primary biliary cholangitis patients with incomplete UDCA response may improve outcomes, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 43, 283, 10.1111/apt.13465 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lu, 2018, Factors associated with prevalence and treatment of primary biliary cholangitis in United States health systems, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16, 1833
  25. Corpechot, 2012, Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis, Hepatology, 56, 198, 10.1002/hep.25599 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Murillo Perez, 2020, Goals of treatment for improved survival in primary biliary cholangitis: Treatment target should be bilirubin within the normal range and normalization of alkaline phosphatase, Am J Gastroenterol, 115, 1066, 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000557 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Corpechot, 2020, Long-term impact of preventive UDCA therapy after transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis, J Hepatol, 73, 559, 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.043 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jones, D. E. J., Beuers, U., Bonder, A., Carbone, M., Culver, E., Dyson, J., Gish, R. G., Hansen, B. E., Hirschfield, G., Jones, R., Kowdley, K., Kremer, A. E., Lindor, K., Mayo, M., Mells, G., Neuberger, J., Prince, M., Swain, M., Tanaka, A., Thorburn, D., Trauner, M., Trivedi, P., Weltman, M., Yeoman, A., & Levy, C.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Toronto General Hospital (CA)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • Liver Institute Northwest (US)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Jones, David E.J.
  • Jones, Rebecca
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
1291-1300
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392984296
Cited by
38
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
  • CSL Behring
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • LifeArc
  • Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical
  • EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
  • Audentes Therapeutics
  • Kowa Company
  • Moderna
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • ZonMw
  • Eisai
  • Novo Nordisk
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver
  • Ipsen
  • Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, drug approval, conditional marketing authorisation, obeticholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, real-world data, rare diseases
MeSH terms
Chenodeoxycholic Acid, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Drug Approval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review