Cited by 5Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Advancing care in primary biliary cholangitis: emerging insights and novel therapies

Open access
Vögelin, Marius, Kremer, Andreas E.·2025·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic liver disease, is associated with fatigue and pruritus and can progress to cirrhosis if left untreated. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the mainstay of therapy for over 40 years. However, 30-40% of PBC patients do not adequately respond to UDCA or have risk factors for disease progression and require second-line treatment. AREAS COVERED: Recent international cohort analyses have provided new insights that enable early identification of high-risk PBC patients and suggest that stricter treatment goals may lower mortality and reduce the need for liver transplantation. Alongside established second-line agents, several promising substances have progressed to phase 2 and 3 trials. Notably, seladelpar and elafibranor, two selective agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, achieved high rates of biochemical response and good tolerability, leading to their recent approval for second-line treatment of PBC. Moreover, dedicated clinical trials addressed fatigue and pruritus, the two main symptoms of PBC. EXPERT OPINION: Personalized treatment approaches for PBC are both feasible and essential to improve biochemical response, extend transplant-free survival and alleviate symptom burden. Well-tolerated novel therapies are poised to reshape the treatment landscape in the near future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14656566.2025.2516622

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vögelin, M., & Kremer, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kremer, Andreas E.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2025-06-16
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1149-1162
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W4411191877
Cited by
5
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid, second-line therapy, seladelpar, elafibranor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, fatigue, pruritus, transplant-free survival, disease progression, personalized treatment, new drugs
MeSH terms
Animals, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Fatigue, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Pruritus, Risk Factors, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Liver Transplantation, Disease Progression, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review