Cited by 351Liver Diseases and ImmunityLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and Transplantation

Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Open access
Corpechot, Christophe, Carrat, Fabrice, Poujol-Robert, Armelle, Gaouar, Farid, Wendum, Dominique, Chazouillères, Olivier, Poupon, Raoul·2012·Hepatology

Abstract

The development of liver fibrosis markers in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is needed to facilitate the assessment of its progression and the effectiveness of new therapies. Here, we investigated the potential usefulness of transient elastography (TE) in the noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis stage and disease progression in PBC. We performed, first, a prospective performance analysis of TE for the diagnosis of METAVIR fibrosis stages in a diagnostic cohort of 103 patients and, second, a retrospective longitudinal analysis of repeated examinations in a monitoring cohort of 150 patients followed-up for up to 5 years. All patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. Diagnostic thresholds of liver stiffness in discriminating fibrosis stages ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and =F4 were 7.1, 8.8, 10.7, and 16.9 kPa, respectively. TE showed high performance and was significantly superior to biochemical markers (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/platelet ratio, FIB-4, hyaluronic acid, AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio, and Mayo score) in diagnosing significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, or cirrhosis. Analysis of the monitoring cohort data set using generalized linear models showed the following: (1) an overall progression rate of 0.48 ± 0.21 kPa/year (P = 0.02) and (2) no significant progression in patients with F0-F1, F2, or F3 stages, but a significant increase (4.06 ± 0.72 kPa/year; P < 0.0001) in cirrhotic patients. A cut-off value of 2.1 kPa/year was associated with an 8.4-fold increased risk of liver decompensations, liver transplantations, or deaths (P < 0.0001, Cox regression analysis). Conclusion: TE is one of the best current surrogate markers of liver fibrosis in PBC. Over a 5-year period, on-treatment liver stiffness appears stable in most noncirrhotic PBC patients, whereas it significantly increases in patients with cirrhosis. Progression of liver stiffness in PBC is predictive of poor outcome. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;56:198–208)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.25599

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liver stiffness and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score are markers of liver fibrosis that are prognostic factors in primary biliary cholangitis.

    “These changes in the bezafibrate group were accompanied by a decrease in liver stiffness and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score, two markers of liver fibrosis that are prognostic factors in primary biliary cholangitis.16,21”

    From A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bezafibrate in Primary Biliary Cholangitis (2018) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies liver stiffness as a surrogate marker of fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis and says its value and increase over time predict poor outcomes. It describes the ELF test as having acceptable diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis or cirrhosis, but does not establish ELF as a prognostic factor. The claim is therefore supported for liver stiffness, not for ELF prognosis. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LSM values above 9.6 kPa are associated with a 5-fold increased risk of liver decompensation, liver transplantation, or death.

    “Furthermore, values of LSM [9.6 kPa are associated with a 5-fold increased risk of liver decompensation, liver transplantation or death [86].”

    From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. (2017) · cites this paper as [86]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LSM assessed by VCTE has been shown to be one of the best surrogate markers for detecting cirrhosis or severe fibrosis in PBC.

    “Liver stiffness measurement LSM, assessed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), has been shown as one of the best surrogate markers for the detection of cirrhosis or severe fibrosis (i.e.bridging fibrosis) in patients with PBC [86][87][88].”
  • Worsening LSM showed higher performance than LSM itself in predicting patient outcomes, suggesting LSM may be used as a surrogate marker of PBC progression.

    “In addition, worsening LSM showed a higher performance than LSM itself in predicting patients' outcomes, suggesting that LSM may be used as a surrogate marker of PBC progression [86].”
  • Patients with cirrhosis treated with UDCA had significant progression of LSM during follow-up.

    “This study showed that patients with cirrhosis treated with UDCA had a significant progression of LSM during follow-up.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corpechot, C., Carrat, F., Poujol-Robert, A., Gaouar, F., Wendum, D., Chazouillères, O., & Poupon, R.
Affiliations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Corpechot, Christophe
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2012-07
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
198-208
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027496830
Cited by
351
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, transient elastography, liver fibrosis, liver stiffness, fibrosis staging, disease progression, prognosis, ursodeoxycholic acid, hepatic decompensation, liver transplantation, non-invasive fibrosis markers, METAVIR score
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Biopsy, Needle, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Liver Function Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Elasticity Imaging Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review