Cited by 111Medication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug adherence in hypertension: from methodological issues to cardiovascular outcomes

Open access

Abstract

: Adherence to treatment is now well recognized as a crucial key in the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs; however, it is often overlooked in the management of hypertension because methodology to assess it is partly unreliable and limits its use in clinical practice. The available evidence suggests that nonadherence is highly prevalent in a chronic asymptomatic condition such as hypertension. It may undermine benefits expected from antihypertensive agents and therefore, may negatively impact cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal outcomes. In this review, we discuss the methodological issues related to the measurement of drug adherence in a research setting and clinical practice, the prevalence and the impact of drug nonadherence on blood pressure control and thus in apparent resistant hypertension, and on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001299

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 88 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hamdidouche, I., Jullien, V., Boutouyrie, P., Billaud, E., Azizi, M., & Laurent, S.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Laurent, Stéphane
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2017-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1133-1144
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2596282637
Cited by
111
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
medication adherence, hypertension, antihypertensive drugs, adherence measurement methods, blood pressure control, resistant hypertension, cardiovascular outcomes, cerebrovascular outcomes, renal outcomes
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiovascular System, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Biomarkers, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review