The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the possibility of reducing the white coat response using an automated sphygmomanometer designed for office use, the BpTRU. Consecutive patients referred from physicians in the community to an ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring unit in an academic hospital were included in the study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A total of 309 patients referred for diagnosis or management of hypertension were studied. Differences between mean awake ABP and BP readings taken by the patient's own physician using a manual sphygmomanometer or the automated BpTRU device with the patient resting alone in the ABP monitoring unit were compared. RESULTS: BP recorded in the examining room using an automated device (132 +/- 19/75 +/- 12) was similar to the mean awake ABP (134 +/- 12/77 +/- 10) with both values being lower (P < 0.001) than the BP recorded on a routine visit to the patient's own family physician (152 +/- 18/87 +/- 11). The coefficient of correlation between the systolic/diastolic ABP and the automated office BP (r = 0.62/0.72) was higher (P < 0.001) than with the family physician's manual BP (r = 0.32/0.48). The prevalence of white coat hypertension in untreated patients (n = 146) was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with automated office BP (16%) compared with the routine family physician BP (55%). CONCLUSION: The white coat response associated with office BP measurements can be virtually eliminated by recording BP with the automated BpTRU device with patients resting alone in a quiet examining room.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000154900.76284.f6 · Cited by 3,985
Cited by
Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Muntner, P., Shimbo, D., Carey, R. M., Charleston, J. B., Gaillard, T., Misra, S., Myers, M. G., Ogedegbe, G., Schwartz, J. E., Townsend, R. R., et al. (2019) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000087 · Cited by 1,512
Self-citationEuropean Society of hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
O’Brien, E., Parati, G., Stergiou, G., Asmar, R., Beilin, L., Bilo, G., Clement, D., de la Sierra, A., de Leeuw, P., Dolan, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328363e964 · Cited by 1,419
Self-citationDiabetes and hypertension: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association
de Boer, I. H., Bangalore, S., Benetos, A., Davis, A. M., Michos, E. D., Muntner, P., Rossing, P., Zoungas, S., & Bakris, G. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci17-0026 · Cited by 714
Effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes
Flint, A. C., Conell, C., Ren, X., Banki, N. M., Chan, S. L., Rao, V. A., Melles, R. B., & Bhatt, D. L. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1803180 · Cited by 684
Daskalopoulou, S. S., Rabi, D. M., Zarnke, K. B., Dasgupta, K., Nerenberg, K., Cloutier, L., Gelfer, M., Lamarre-Cliche, M., Milot, A., Bolli, P., et al. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.02.016 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, M. G., Valdivieso, M., & Kiss, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 280-286
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031151303
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32831b9e6b
- The paper
- Myers, M. G., Valdivieso, M., & Kiss, A. (2009). Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32831b9e6b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.