The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of vitamin D on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D insufficiency has been linked to hypertension and cardiovascular events in observational studies. It is unclear whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce blood pressure, and, if so, by how much. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether vitamin D reduces blood pressure. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane library were searched, supplemented by searches of grey literature, unpublished trials and references from included studies. Studies were assessed by two reviewers independently according to a prespecified protocol. Interventions included activated vitamin D, unactivated vitamin D2 and D3 and ultraviolet B radiation. RESULTS: Eleven randomized, controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Studies were small and of variable methodological quality. Mean baseline blood pressure was more than 140/90 mmHg in eight studies. Meta-analysis of these eight studies showed a nonsignificant reduction in systolic blood pressure in the vitamin D group compared with placebo [-3.6 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.0 to 0.7]. A small, statistically significant reduction was seen in diastolic blood pressure (-3.1 mmHg, 95% CI -5.5 to -0.6). Subgroup analysis suggested that unactivated vitamin D produced a greater fall in systolic blood pressure than activated vitamin D (-6.2 mmHg, 95% CI -12.32 to -0.04, vs. +0.7 mmHg, 95% CI -4.8 to 6.2). No reduction in blood pressure was seen in studies examining patients who were normotensive at baseline. CONCLUSION: We found weak evidence to support a small effect of vitamin D on blood pressure in studies of hypertensive patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Autier, P. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.16.1730 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Theodoratou, E., Tzoulaki, I., Zgaga, L., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2035 · Cited by 956
Pludowski, P., Holick, M. F., Pilz, S., Wagner, C. L., Hollis, B. W., Grant, W. B., Shoenfeld, Y., Lerchbaum, E., Llewellyn, D. J., Kienreich, K., et al. (2013) · Autoimmunity Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.02.004 · Cited by 836
Vitamin D-effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5010111 · Cited by 733
Ford, J. A., MacLennan, G. S., Avenell, A., Bolland, M., Grey, A., & Witham, M. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.082602 · Cited by 268
Self-citationRied, K., & Fakler, P. (2014) · Integrated Blood Pressure Control · doi:10.2147/ibpc.s51434 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Witham, M. D., Nadir, M. A., & Struthers, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1948-1954
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060460750
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of vitamin D on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32832f075b
- The paper
- Witham, M. D., Nadir, M. A., & Struthers, A. D. (2009). Effect of vitamin D on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32832f075b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.