Cited by 36Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesMedication Adherence and ComplianceSodium Intake and Health

Efficacy of isolated home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure control: randomized controlled trial with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring – MONITOR study

Fuchs, Sandra C., Ferreira-da-silva, André L., Moreira, Leila B., Neyeloff, Jeruza L., Fuchs, Felipe C., Gus, Miguel, Wiehe, Mário, Fuchs, Flávio D.·2012·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of control of hypertension remain unsatisfactory worldwide and simple methods to encourage patients to adhere to treatments are still necessary. In this randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of a protocol of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), without medication titration, to improve BP assessed by ambulatory BPM (ABPM). METHODS: Patients with hypertension under drug treatment and with uncontrolled BP at office and by 24-h ABPM were randomly assigned to HBPM or usual care. The treatment was not modified during the trial. Follow-up visits were conducted at 7 and 30 days after randomization, and at 60 days to assess the outcome. Deltas between baseline and final ABPM measurements were calculated for 24-h, nightly and daily ambulatory SBP and DBP. RESULTS: Of 558 patients screened, 136 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were randomized, and 121 (89%) completed the trial. The between groups deltas (95% confidence interval) of variation of 24 h, nightly and daily SBP were 5.4 (0.9-9.8) (P = 0.018), 10.9 (2.9-18.9) (P = 0.012) and 4.4 mmHg (-0.1 to 8.8) (P = 0.055), respectively; the corresponding deltas for DBP were 4.5 (1.6-7.4) (P = 0.003), 3.4 (0.4-6.3) (P = 0.025) and 5.8 mmHg (2.5-9.0) (P = 0.001), respectively. At the end of the trial, 32.4% of patients of the HBPM groups and 16.2% of the control group had 24-h SBP less than 130/80 mmHg (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A protocol of HBPM without medication titration enhances the control of BP assessed by ABPM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32834e5a4f

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuchs, S. C., Ferreira-da-silva, A. L., Moreira, L. B., Neyeloff, J. L., Fuchs, F. C., Gus, M., Wiehe, M., & Fuchs, F. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Fuchs, Sandra C.
  • Fuchs, Felipe C.
  • Fuchs, Flávio D.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2012-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
75-80
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322061283
Cited by
36
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
home blood pressure monitoring, hypertension, blood pressure control, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, medication adherence, antihypertensive therapy, uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review