Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of death globally. Despite proven health benefits and international recommendations, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation programs is poor. Telehealth (phone, Internet, and videoconference communication between patient and health-care provider) has emerged as an innovative way of delivering health interventions. This review aimed to determine telehealth effectiveness in CHD management. Study design includes systematic review with meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials evaluating telehealth interventions in patients with CHD were identified by searching multiple electronic databases, reference lists, relevant conference lists, gray literature, and key-word searching of the Internet. Studies were selected if they evaluated a telephone, videoconference, or web-based intervention, provided objective measurements of mortality, changes in multiple risk factor levels or quality of life. In total, 11 trials were identified (3145 patients). Telehealth interventions were associated with nonsignificant lower all-cause mortality than controls [relative risk=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.45-1.1; P=0.12]. These interventions showed a significantly lower weighted mean difference (WMD) at medium long-term follow-up than controls for total cholesterol (WMD=0.37 mmol/l, 95% CI=0.19-0.56, P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (WMD=4.69 mmHg, 95% CI=2.91-6.47, P<0.001), and fewer smokers (relative risk = 0.84, 95% CI=0.65-0.98, P = 0.04). Significant favorable changes at follow-up were also found in high-density lipoprotien and low-density lipoprotein. In conclusion, telehealth interventions provide effective risk factor reduction and secondary prevention. Provision of telehealth models could help increase uptake of a formal secondary prevention by those who do not access cardiac rehabilitation and narrow the current evidence-practice gap.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was no difference in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease mortality with a telephone-mediated health behaviour change programme.
“There was also no difference in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease mortality with a telephone-mediated health behaviour change programme [92], [93].”
From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582 · see citing works
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 · Cited by 2,755 · see citing works
Clinical Trial of an Internet-based Case Management System for Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease
Southard, B. H., Southard, D. R., & Nuckolls, J. (2003) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00008483-200309000-00003 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members:, Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Ž., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 · Cited by 8,490 · see citing works
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M.-T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 · Cited by 6,457 · see citing works
Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews
Ekeland, A. G., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Balady, G. J., Ades, P. A., Bittner, V. A., Franklin, B. A., Gordon, N. F., Thomas, R. J., Tomaselli, G. F., & Yancy, C. W. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31823b21e2 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Varnfield, M., Karunanithi, M., Lee, C.-K., Honeyman, E., Arnold, D., Ding, H., Smith, C., & Walters, D. L. (2014) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rawstorn, J. C., Gant, N., Direito, A., Beckmann, C., & Maddison, R. (2016) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308966 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Maddison, R., Pfaeffli, L., Whittaker, R., Stewart, R., Kerr, A., Jiang, Y., Kira, G., Leung, W., Dalleck, L., Carter, K., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487314535076 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview
McLean, S., Sheikh, A., Cresswell, K., Nurmatov, U., Mukherjee, M., Hemmi, A., & Pagliari, C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071238 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
The mobile revolution—using smartphone apps to prevent cardiovascular disease
Neubeck, L., Lowres, N., Benjamin, E. J., Freedman, S. B., Coorey, G., & Redfern, J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.34 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, K., Liu, W., He, D., Huang, B., Xiao, D., Peng, Y., He, Y., Hu, H., Chen, M., & Huang, D. (2015) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487314561168 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
F. Piepoli, M. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Telemedicine Service for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease
Blasco, A., Carmona, M., Fernández-Lozano, I., Salvador, C. H., Pascual, M., Sagredo, P. G., Somolinos, R., Muñoz, A., García-López, F., Escudier, J. M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/hcr.0b013e3182343aa7 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Gallagher, R., Roach, K., Sadler, L., Glinatsis, H., Belshaw, J., Kirkness, A., Zhang, L., Gallagher, P., Paull, G., Gao, Y., et al. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.8352 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of the effect of telehealth on mortality: A systematic review of meta-analyses
Snoswell, C. L., Stringer, H., Taylor, M. L., Caffery, L. J., & Smith, A. C. (2023) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x211023700 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Brørs, G., Pettersen, T. R., Hansen, T. B., Fridlund, B., Hølvold, L. B., Lund, H., & Norekvål, T. M. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Scane, K., Alter, D., Oh, P., & Brooks, D. (2012) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/h11-151 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Neubeck, L., Redfern, J. U., Fernandez, R., Briffa, T., Bauman, A., & Freedman, S. B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU)
- South Western Sydney Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Sydney, New South Wales
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Neubeck, Lis
- Venue
- European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-289
- ISSN
- 1741-8267 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042544609
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Sydney
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- telemedicine, coronary artery disease, secondary prevention, cardiac rehabilitation, telephone-delivered intervention, videoconferencing, online intervention, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk factors, cholesterol, blood pressure, smoking, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Coronary Disease, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Telephone, Time Factors, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Internet, Videoconferencing, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review