Cited by 67Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCardiac Health and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Modes of e-Health delivery in secondary prevention programmes for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review

Open access
Brørs, Gunhild, Pettersen, Trond Røed, Hansen, Tina B., Fridlund, Bengt, Hølvold, Linn Benjaminsen, Lund, Hans, Norekvål, Tone M.·2019·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health (e-Health) interventions are emerging as an effective alternative model for improving secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of different modes of delivery and components in e-Health secondary prevention programmes on adherence to treatment, modifiable CAD risk factors and psychosocial outcomes for patients with CAD. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out based on articles found in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase. Studies evaluating secondary prevention e-Health programmes provided through mobile-Health (m-Health), web-based technology or a combination of m-Health and web-based technology were eligible. The main outcomes measured were adherence to treatment, modifiable CAD risk factors and psychosocial outcomes. The quality appraisal of the studies included was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for RCT. The results were synthesised narratively. RESULT: A total of 4834 titles were identified and 1350 were screened for eligibility. After reviewing 123 articles in full, 24 RCTs including 3654 participants with CAD were included. Eight studies delivered secondary prevention programmes through m-Health, nine through web-based technology, and seven studies used a combination of m-Health and web-based technology. The majority of studies employed two or three secondary prevention components, of which health education was employed in 21 studies. The m-Health programmes reported positive effects on adherence to medication. Most studies evaluating web-based technology programmes alone or in combination with m-Health also utilised traditional CR, and reported improved modifiable CAD risk factors. The quality appraisal showed a moderate methodological quality of the studies. CONCLUSION: Evidence exists that supports the use of e-Health interventions for improving secondary prevention of CAD. However, a comparison across studies highlighted a wide variability of components and outcomes within the different modes of delivery. High quality trials are needed to define the most efficient mode of delivery and components capable of addressing a favourable outcome for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Ryan R Synnot A Prictor M Hill S Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Data extraction template for included studies Standard Protocol Text and Additional Guidance for Review Authors 2016 Melbourne La Trobe University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brørs, G., Pettersen, T. R., Hansen, T. B., Fridlund, B., Hølvold, L. B., Lund, H., & Norekvål, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Namsos Hospital (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Norekvål, Tone M.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
364-364
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950476514
Cited by
67
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Helse Vest (912184)
  • Helse Nord-Trøndelag (18/3742)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
e-health, secondary prevention, coronary artery disease, mobile health, online intervention, medication adherence, modifiable risk factors, psychosocial outcomes, health education, cardiac rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Coronary Artery Disease, Health Promotion, Humans, Prospective Studies, Telemedicine, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review