CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship Between Neurocognitive Function and Self-Discrepancy After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Beadle, Elizabeth Jane, Ownsworth, Tamara, Fleming, Jennifer, Shum, David H. K.·2018·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1097/htr.0000000000000360
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often make unfavorable comparisons between their preinjury and postinjury selves. Although it is known that negative "self-discrepancy" is related to poorer emotional adjustment, the impact of neurocognitive function on self-discrepancy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between current neurocognitive function (attention, memory, executive function, and self-awareness) and self-discrepancy after severe TBI. Design Fifty-four adults with severe TBI were recruited from outpatient and community rehabilitation services and completed measures of self-discrepancy (Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale-III) and self-awareness (Awareness Questionnaire) and a battery of standardized tests of attention, memory, and executive functions. Results More negative self-discrepancy was significantly associated with greater self-awareness (r = -0.40, P Conclusion Better neurocognitive function is related to more negative self-discrepancy. These findings improve understanding of the process of identity reconstruction following TBI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/htr.0000000000000360

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Bryan-Hancock, 2010, The global burden of traumatic brain injury: preliminary results from the Global Burden of Disease Project, Injury Prevention, 16, A17, 10.1136/ip.2010.029215.61 · DOI
  2. Ben-Yishay, 1996, Reflections on the evolution of the therapeutic milieu concept, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 6, 327, 10.1080/713755514 · DOI
  3. Cantor, 2005, The role of self-discrepancy theory in understanding posttraumatic brain injury affective disorders: a pilot study, J Head Trauma Rehab, 20, 527, 10.1097/00001199-200511000-00005 · DOI
  4. Beadle, 2016, The impact of traumatic brain injury on self-identity: a systematic review of the evidence for self-concept changes, J Head Trauma Rehab, 31, E12, 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000158 · DOI
  5. Curvis, Factors associated with self-esteem following acquired brain injury in adults: a systematic review [published online ahead of print March 3, 2016], Neuropsychol Rehabil
  6. Wright, 1996, Psychological problems following minor head injury: a prospective study, Br J Clin Psychol, 35, 399, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01194.x · DOI
  7. Reddy, 2017, A biopsychosocial investigation of changes in self-concept on the Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 27, 1103, 10.1080/09602011.2015.1114499 · DOI
  8. Mograbi, 2009, Anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease-the petrified self, Conscious Cogn, 18, 989, 10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.005 · DOI
  9. Stuss, 2007, Is there a dysexecutive syndrome?, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 362, 901, 10.1098/rstb.2007.2096 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Northoff, 2011, Brain imaging of the self-conceptual, anatomical and methodological issues, Conscious Cogn, 20, 52, 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ham, 2013, The neural basis of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury, Brain, 137, 586, 10.1093/brain/awt350 · DOI
  12. Gracey, 2008, Editorial, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 18, 522, 10.1080/09602010802141509 · DOI
  13. Dirette, 2008, Patterns and antecedents of the development of self-awareness following traumatic brain injury: the importance of occupation, Br J Occup Ther, 71, 44, 10.1177/030802260807100202 · DOI
  14. Ben-Tishay, 2000, Examined lives: outcomes after holistic rehabilitation, Rehab Psychol, 45, 112, 10.1037/0090-5550.45.2.112 · DOI
  15. Toglia, 2000, Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury, Neurorehabilitation, 15, 57, 10.3233/NRE-2000-15104 · DOI
  16. Gracey, 2009, Capturing process and outcome in complex rehabilitation interventions: a “Y-shaped” model, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 19, 867, 10.1080/09602010903027763 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ownsworth, 2013, Comparison of error-based and errorless learning for people with severe traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized control trial, Trials, 14, 369, 10.1186/1745-6215-14-369 · DOI
  18. Tyerman, 1984, Changes in self-concept following severe head injury, Int J Rehabil Res, 7, 11, 10.1097/00004356-198403000-00002 · DOI
  19. Benedict, 1998, Hopkin Verbal Learning Test-Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability, Clin Neuropsychol, 12, 43, 10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sherer, 1998, The Awareness Questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency, Brain Inj, 12, 63, 10.1080/026990598122863 · DOI
  21. Anson, 2006, Coping and emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 21, 248, 10.1097/00001199-200605000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Shields, 2015, A transdiagnostic investigation of emotional distress after traumatic brain injury, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 26, 410, 10.1080/09602011.2015.1037772 · DOI
  23. Faul, 2009, Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlations and regression analyses, Behav Res Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Preacher, 2004, SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models, Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 36, 717, 10.3758/BF03206553 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Conway, 2000, The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system, Psychol Rev, 107, 261, 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Conway, 2005, Memory and the self, J mem Lang, 53, 594, 10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Agnew, 1998, The heterogeneity of anosognosia for memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: a review of the literature and a proposed model, Aging Ment Health, 2, 7, 10.1080/13607869856876 · DOI
  28. Naylor, 2008, Awareness of memory functioning, autobiographical memory and identity in early stage dementia, Neuropsychol Rehabil, 18, 590, 10.1080/09602010701608681 · DOI
  29. Ylvisaker, 2000, Reflections on Dobermanns, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult to serve individuals with traumatic brain injury, Aphasiology, 14, 407, 10.1080/026870300401432 · DOI
  30. Ownsworth, 2006, The association between awareness deficits and rehabilitation outcome following acquired brain injury, Clin Psychol Rev, 26, 783, 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.05.003 · DOI
  31. Coste, 2015, Disruption of temporally extended self-memory system following traumatic brain injury, Neuropsychologia, 71, 133, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.014 · DOI
  32. Schmidt, 2013, Video feedback on functional task performance improves self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 27, 316, 10.1177/1545968312469838 · DOI
  33. Fleming, 2017, The efficacy of prospective memory rehabilitation plus metacognitive skills training for adults with traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials, 18
  34. Ownsworth, 2013, Comparison of error-based and errorless learning for people with severe traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized control trial, Trials, 14, 369., 10.1186/1745-6215-14-369 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beadle, E. J., Ownsworth, T., Fleming, J., & Shum, D. H. K.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2018-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
E42-E50
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/htr.0000000000000360
OpenAlex
W2770951804
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, self-discrepancy, neurocognitive function, self-awareness, attention, memory, executive function, verbal fluency, identity reconstruction, emotional adjustment
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Awareness, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Self Concept, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review