Cited by 135Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Brain imaging of the self-conceptual, anatomical and methodological issues

Northoff, Georg, Qin, Pengmin, Feinberg, Todd E.·2011·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

In this paper we consider two major issues: conceptual-experimental approaches to the self, and the neuroanatomical substrate of the self. We distinguish content- and processed-based concepts of the self that entail different experimental strategies, and anatomically, we investigate the concept of midline structures in further detail and present a novel view on the anatomy of an integrated subcortical-cortical midline system. Presenting meta-analytic evidence, we show that the anterior paralimbic, e.g. midline, regions do indeed seem to be specific for self-specific stimuli. We conclude that future investigation of the self need to develop novel concepts that are more empirically plausible than those currently in use. Different concepts of self will require novel experimental designs that include, for example, the brain's resting state activity as an independent variable. Modifications of both conceptual and anatomical dimensions will allow an empirically more plausible account of the relationship between brain and self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.011

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bilateral TPJ, mPPC, and mPFC are centrally implicated in self-referential processing.

    “All three regions are also centrally implicated in self-referential processing (D’Argembeau et al., 2007; Northoff et al., 2011; Pfeifer et al., 2007; Pfeifer et al., 2009; Pfeifer & Peake, 2011), raising the possibility that making safe decisions in such an amplified social-evaluative context may be more salient to adolescents’ social self-concept, although perhaps in a sample of high-risk teens”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Northoff, G., Qin, P., & Feinberg, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Mental Health Research (CA)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Northoff, Georg
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
52-63
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172091351
Cited by
135
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
self, self-representation, resting-state brain activity
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Ego, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review