Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DRUSEN CHARACTERIZATION WITH MULTIMODAL IMAGING

Open access
Spaide, Richard F, Curcio, Christine A·2010·Retina

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the known appearance of cuticular drusen, subretinal drusenoid deposits (reticular pseudodrusen), and soft drusen as revealed by multimodal fundus imaging and to create an explanatory model that accounts for these observations. METHODS: Reported color, fluorescein angiographic, autofluorescence, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography images of patients with cuticular drusen, soft drusen, and subretinal drusenoid deposits were reviewed, as were actual images from affected eyes. Representative histological sections were examined. The geometry, location, and imaging characteristics of these lesions were evaluated. A hypothesis based on the Beer-Lambert law of light absorption was generated to fit these observations. RESULTS: Cuticular drusen appear as numerous, uniform, round, yellow-white punctate accumulations under the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Soft drusen are larger, yellow-white dome-shaped mounds of deposit under the RPE. Subretinal drusenoid deposits are polymorphous light-gray interconnected accumulations above the RPE. Based on the model, both cuticular and soft drusen appear yellow because of the removal of shorter wavelength light by a double pass through the RPE. Subretinal drusenoid deposits, which are located on the RPE, are not subjected to short-wavelength attenuation and therefore are more prominent when viewed with blue light. The location and morphology of extracellular material in relationship to the RPE, and associated changes to RPE morphology and pigmentation, appeared to be the primary determinants of druse appearance in different imaging modalities. CONCLUSION: Although cuticular drusen, subretinal drusenoid deposits, and soft drusen are composed of common components, they are distinguishable by multimodal imaging because of differences in location, morphology, and optical filtering effects by drusenoid material and the RPE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181ee5ce8

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Spaide, R. F., & Curcio, C. A.
Venue
Retina
Published
2010-10
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
1441-1454
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062160894
Cited by
386
References
49
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DRUSEN CHARACTERIZATION WITH MULTIMODAL IMAGING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181ee5ce8
The paper
Spaide, R. F., & Curcio, C. A. (2010). DRUSEN CHARACTERIZATION WITH MULTIMODAL IMAGING. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181ee5ce8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.