The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How do placebo effects contribute to mindfulness-based analgesia? Probing acute pain effects and interactions using a randomized balanced placebo design
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Recent sham-controlled studies suggest placebo effects contribute to acute pain relief after mindfulness interventions. However, the specific effects of mindfulness processes and their interaction with placebo effects remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the role of mindfulness and placebo processes underlying mindfulness-based pain attenuation. Both treatment (focused attention mindfulness vs sham) and instruction (told mindfulness vs told sham) were manipulated in a balanced placebo design. Changes in acute heat pain were evaluated in 153 healthy adults randomized to receive 6 × 20 minutes of 1 of 4 treatment by instruction interventions or no treatment. Participants receiving any intervention demonstrated improved pain outcomes (unpleasantness, intensity, and tolerance) relative to those receiving no treatment. The instruction manipulation increased expectation for pain relief in those told mindfulness relative to those told sham, but there were no main effects or interactions of treatment or instruction on pain outcomes. However, irrespective of actual intervention received, the belief of receiving mindfulness predicted increased pain threshold and tolerance, with expectancy fully mediating the effect on pain tolerance. These findings suggest a lack of specific effects of mindfulness and instruction on acute pain. Nonetheless, participants' expectancies and beliefs about the treatment they received did predict pain relief. Together with the overall improvement after any intervention, these findings suggest that expectancy and belief may play a stronger role in attenuating acute pain in novices following brief mindfulness interventions than the actual mindfulness-specific processes or instructions delivered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results showed that, while any active treatment resulted in better outcomes compared to no treatment, no significant interaction as well as no main effect of either focused-attention mindfulness or expectation induction on pain was found.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“They did find a significant main effect of mindfulness on anxiety.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“To date, one other study has used a balanced placebo design to examine the effects of six 20-minute sessions of mindfulness (i.e., focused-attention mindfulness vs sham) and induced expectations (i.e., told mindfulness vs told sham) on pain and as well as anxiety as a secondary outcome measure (Davies et al., 2022).”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“This may explain why Davies et al. (2022) also found that, while there were no main effects of mindfulness or expectation induction on pain, receiving any treatment was always better than no treatment at all.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Results showed that, while any active treatment resulted in better outcomes compared to no treatment, no significant interaction as well as no main effect of either focused-attention mindfulness or expectation induction on pain was found.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“They also included a no treatment control group.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Davies et al. (2022) found that a participant's a-priori conviction that the intervention was mindfulness predicted the effectiveness of the intervention, independently of what intervention was actually used.”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update
Wampold, B. E. (2015) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20238 · Cited by 1,728
Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training
Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Diamond, B. J., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014 · Cited by 1,363
Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior.
Kirsch, I. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.11.1189 · Cited by 1,014
Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Hilton, L., Hempel, S., Ewing, B. A., Apaydin, E., Xenakis, L., Newberry, S., Colaiaco, B., Maher, A. R., Shanman, R. M., Sorbero, M. E., et al. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2 · Cited by 977
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Gutierrez, P. M., Kopper, B. A., Merrifield, T., & Grittmann, L. (2000) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1005548801037 · Cited by 944
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Kopper, B. A., Hauptmann, W., Jones, J., & O'Neill, E. (1997) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1025570508954 · Cited by 881
Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice
Dahl, C. J., Lutz, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001 · Cited by 809
Brain Mechanisms Supporting the Modulation of Pain by Mindfulness Meditation
Zeidan, F., Martucci, K. T., Kraft, R. A., Gordon, N. S., McHaffie, J. G., & Coghill, R. C. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5791-10.2011 · Cited by 640
Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program
Baer, R. A., Carmody, J., & Hunsinger, M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21865 · Cited by 546
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hohenschurz‐Schmidt, D., Vase, L., Scott, W., Annoni, M., Ajayi, O. K., Barth, J., Bennell, K. L., Berna, C., Bialosky, J. E., BRAITHWAITE, F., et al. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-072108 · Cited by 110
Research in Mindfulness Interventions for Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Critical Review
Leça, S., & Tavares, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2022.920271 · Cited by 29
Sharpe, L., Jones, E. B., Pradhan, P., Todd, J., & Colagiuri, B. (2022) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002784 · Cited by 23
A synthesis of meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions in pain
Sharpe, L., Richmond, B., Menzies, R. E., Forrest, D., Crombez, G., & Colagiuri, B. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002997 · Cited by 20
Davies, J. N., Colagiuri, B., Sharpe, L., & Day, M. A. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002928 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, J. N., Sharpe, L., Day, M. A., & Colagiuri, B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, Jonathan N.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2022-01-25
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1967-1977
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- 1872-6623
- OpenAlex
- W4210571365
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- placebo effect, acute pain, sham treatment, pain anticipation, pain tolerance, pain threshold, pain unpleasantness, treatment beliefs, brief mindfulness intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analgesia, Humans, Pain Measurement, Placebo Effect, Acute Pain, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
