Cited by 809Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice

Open access
Dahl, Cortland J., Lutz, Antoine, Davidson, Richard J.·2015·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Scientific research highlights the central role of specific psychological processes, in particular those related to the self, in various forms of human suffering and flourishing. This view is shared by Buddhism and other contemplative and humanistic traditions, which have developed meditation practices to regulate these processes. Building on a previous paper in this journal, we propose a novel classification system that categorizes specific styles of meditation into attentional, constructive, and deconstructive families based on their primary cognitive mechanisms. We suggest that meta-awareness, perspective taking and cognitive reappraisal, and self-inquiry may be important mechanisms in specific families of meditation and that alterations in these processes may be used to target states of experiential fusion, maladaptive self-schema, and cognitive reification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When implemented with appropriate methodological and ethical safeguards, these approaches are associated with improvements in psychological well-being, adaptive reappraisal, and meaning reconstruction.

    “When implemented with appropriate methodological and ethical safeguards (73, 95, 96), these approaches are associated with improvements in psychological well-being, adaptive reappraisal, and meaning reconstruction (36, 57, 65, 97–99).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Constructive Family section (page unavailable) describes cognitive reappraisal, adaptive changes to self-schema, and a reorientation toward what is meaningful in life. It proposes that these practices may foster well-being, but says their effects and the role of reappraisal are not yet clear; it does not establish the claimed improvements. The safeguards clause has separate citations and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Outcomes of mindfulness training vary as a function of dispositional traits, psychological readiness, and contextual factors including program structure, instructor competence, and ethical framing.

    “At the same time, outcomes vary as a function of dispositional traits (e.g., absorption, openness), psychological readiness, and contextual factors including program structure, instructor competence, and ethical framing (35, 73, 95, 100, 101).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Concluding Remarks and Future Directions section says that ethics and the wider context of practice matter, and that belief and expectation shape subjective experience. It does not identify absorption, openness, psychological readiness, program structure, or instructor competence as determinants of mindfulness-training outcomes. It calls for further research rather than establishing the full set of outcome predictors claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In some contemplative traditions, attentional and constructive meditation types are conceptualised as practices that can cognitively and emotionally prepare the meditator for difficult experiences that can arise in intensive deconstructive meditation practice.

    “In some contemplative traditions, attentional and constructive meditation types are occasionally conceptualised as practices that can cognitively and emotionally prepare the meditator—for example, by strengthening meta-awareness and nurturing acceptance—for the difficult experiences that can arise within the context of intensive deconstructive meditation practice [37].”

    From Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Decentering is identified as a mechanism of action in models of mindfulness.

    “As decentering is a mechanism of action identified in models of mindfulness (Bernstein et al., 2015; Dahl, Lutz, & Davidson, 2015; Lau et al., 2006; Shapiro et al., 2006)”
  • Mindfulness training represents the implementation of primarily one meditative approach drawn from rich contemplative traditions.

    “Importantly, mindfulness training represents the implementation of primarily one meditative approach drawn from rich contemplative traditions [54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Wells A Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy 2000 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  2. [103]Eifring H Meditation in Judaism, Christianity and Islam 2015 Bloomsbury Academic

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahl, C. J., Lutz, A., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Richard J.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
515-523
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1804384498
Cited by
809
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P01AT004952)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
meditation, self, cognitive mechanisms, meta-awareness, perspective taking, cognitive reappraisal, self-inquiry, self-schemas, Buddhism, contemplative practice
MeSH terms
Attention, Awareness, Cognition, Humans, Self Concept, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review