The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 55 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Digit Symbol Substitution Test: The Case for Sensitivity Over Specificity in Neuropsychological Testing
Open accessAbstract
Purpose/Background: Development of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was initiated over a century ago as an experimental tool to understand human associative learning. Its clinical utility, owing to its brevity and high discriminant validity, was first recognized in the 1940s, and now the DSST is among the most commonly used tests in clinical neuropsychology. Methods: Specific studies and articles were reviewed to illustrate what the test measures, to evaluate its sensitivity to change, and to discuss its use in clinical practice. Results: The DSST is a valid and sensitive measure of cognitive dysfunction impacted by many domains. Performance on the DSST correlates with real-world functional outcomes (eg, the ability to accomplish everyday tasks) and recovery from functional disability in a range of psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Importantly, the DSST has been demonstrated to be sensitive to changes in cognitive functioning in patients with major depressive disorder and offers promise as a clinical decision-making tool for monitoring treatment effects in this and other disorders affecting cognition. Implications/Conclusions: The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function across a wide range of clinical populations but has low specificity to determine exactly which cognitive domain has been affected. However, the DSST offers a practical and effective method to monitor cognitive functions over time in clinical practice.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a brief, widely used paper-and-pencil measure that is sensitive to cognitive dysfunction and change across many clinical populations, including major depressive disorder (MDD). It is polyfactorial and has low specificity for identifying which cognitive domain is impaired, but it may be useful for monitoring cognition over time in clinical practice.
Key findings
- The DSST is sensitive to cognitive impairment and change across psychiatric, neurologic, pharmacologic, and sleep-related conditions; in MDD, a meta-analysis of 1904 subjects across 22 studies found moderate impairment versus controls (Cohen’s d = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34–0.75; P < 0.001).
- Vortioxetine trials in MDD reported DSST treatment effect sizes of 0.51 and 0.52 for 10 or 20 mg in one study and 0.254 for 10 to 20 mg in another; a meta-analysis found vortioxetine improved DSST-assessed cognition more than other antidepressants.
- DSST performance correlates with real-world functional outcomes: in MDD patients 6 months after hospital discharge, DSST was strongly associated with functional recovery in work, school, and housing (odds ratio nearly 20).
- The DSST is polyfactorial and sensitive but not specific: impaired performance can arise from motor speed, attention, visuoperceptual functions, associative learning, working memory, and executive functions, so it does not by itself identify the affected cognitive domain.
Methods
- Narrative review of specific studies and articles to illustrate what the DSST measures, its sensitivity to change, and its use in clinical practice.
- Evidence reviewed includes DSST studies in brain damage, schizophrenia, MDD, diabetes, sleep restriction, alcohol intoxication, and sedative/hypnotic pharmacodynamic studies.
- Main synthesis compares DSST effect sizes across patient groups and pharmacologic benchmarks, including alcohol, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, caffeine, and sleep deprivation.
Limitations
- The paper states the DSST has low specificity for determining exactly which cognitive domain has been affected and raises the question of whether a single brief cognitive assessment can be sufficient for clinically meaningful conclusions.
- The paper notes that repeated DSST administration may produce learning or practice effects, although randomized designs can overcome resulting confounding in some studies.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review of selected studies rather than a systematic review, and it does not report a formal search strategy, inclusion criteria, or quantitative synthesis of all available DSST evidence.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Not checked yet · 28 Own interpretation · 11 Sources not found · 2 No basis given · 1 Own method
In the paper
“This observation suggests that improvement with exposure occurs in part for reasons other than associative learning of the pairs.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Beres CA Baron A Improved digit symbol substitution by older women as a result of extended practice. J Gerontol. 1981; 36: 591– 597. 7264244 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The sensitivity of the DSST is owed, in part, to its property as a polyfactoriaI measure.28”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] Ryan C Butters N Didario B The relationship between abstinence and recovery of function in male alcoholics. Clin Neuropsychol. 1980; 2: 125– 134.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“These findings indicate that the executive function of strategizing or consciously exerting effort to learn the pairings is among the activities that contribute to performance on this test.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Beres CA Baron A Improved digit symbol substitution by older women as a result of extended practice. J Gerontol. 1981; 36: 591– 597. 7264244 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This finding supports the observation that the DSST is a polyfactorial test”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Lezak MD Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Compared with placebo, triazolam significantly impaired performance on the DSST (P < 0.001) and increased beta amplitude on the EEG (P < 0.002).34”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Greenblatt DJ Gan L Harmatz JS Pharmocokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single-dose triazolam: electroencephalography compared with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 60: 244– 248. 16120062 PMC1884767 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and that impairment in any one of the required domains (ie, motor speed associated with aging) results in performance decline.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Lezak MD Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In both middle-aged and older persons, diabetes mellitus type 2 has been found to be associated with an increased risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.30”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Dong Y Kua ZJ Khoo EY The utility of brief cognitive tests for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; 17: 889– 895. 27461866 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“That the DSST is sensitive to age effects is well known.23”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Hoyer WJ Stawski RS Wasylyshyn C Adult age and digit symbol substitution performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2004; 19: 211– 214. 15065945 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This correlation of specific QEEG indices with activation in the frontal lobes supports the theory that executive functioning plays a part in DSST performance.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [25] Thornton KE Carmody DP Symbol Digit and the quantitative EEG. Neurotherapy. 2012; 16: 210– 222.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function across a wide range of clinical populations but has low specificity to determine exactly which cognitive domain has been affected.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Implications/Conclusions
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function across a wide range of clinical populations but has low specificity to determine exactly which cognitive domain has been affected.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Implications/Conclusions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Beres and Baron22 findings suggest that age-related effects are attributable to age differences in motor speed and not in higher cognitive functions.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Beres CA Baron A Improved digit symbol substitution by older women as a result of extended practice. J Gerontol. 1981; 36: 591– 597. 7264244 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“While psychomotor retardation contributed to impaired performance in these patient populations, the investigators, using other cognitive measures, determined that visuoperceptive processing impairments were also involved in DSST performance.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Glosser G Butters N Kaplan E Visuoperceptual processes in brain damaged patients on the digit symbol substitution test. Int J Neurosci. 1977; 7: 59– 66. 893004 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Both DSST and EEG changes closely tracked changes in plasma triazolam concentrations over time.34”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Greenblatt DJ Gan L Harmatz JS Pharmocokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single-dose triazolam: electroencephalography compared with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 60: 244– 248. 16120062 PMC1884767 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although learning or practice effects may occur because the same test is administered multiple times, the randomized design of the study overcomes any resulting confounding factors.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Thapar P Zacny JP Thompson W Using alcohol as a standard to assess the degree of impairment induced by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 53– 59. 7832334 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in elderly populations, copying speed alone explains 72% of the variance in performance difference between young and elderly groups.18”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Lezak MD Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST's sensitivity to change, both acutely and chronically, is one of its hallmark features.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In schizophrenic patients, processing speed is known to be a critically impaired cognitive ability.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function across a wide range of clinical populations but has low specificity to determine exactly which cognitive domain has been affected.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Implications/Conclusions
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors showed that test performance was associated with QEEG indices, including relative power and coherence at several frequency bands, particularly within the frontal region of the brain.25”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [25] Thornton KE Carmody DP Symbol Digit and the quantitative EEG. Neurotherapy. 2012; 16: 210– 222.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Different magnitudes of cognitive effect, as measured with the DSST, can be used to make comparative inferences about the relative effects of various doses of agents, such as alcohol, on cognitive performance (Fig. 2).33”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Thapar P Zacny JP Thompson W Using alcohol as a standard to assess the degree of impairment induced by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 53– 59. 7832334 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors demonstrated that the DSST could statistically significantly distinguish the cognitive effect of the H1 antagonist diphenhydramine from placebo with an effect size of 0.28 (calculated from the published statistics).”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Roth T Roehrs T Koshorek G Sedative effects of antihistamines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987; 80: 94– 98. 2885356 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Digit Symbol Substitution Test performance was markedly reduced during alcohol intoxication with scores approximately 10 points lower than that of placebo.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Thapar P Zacny JP Thompson W Using alcohol as a standard to assess the degree of impairment induced by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 53– 59. 7832334 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, the DSST has been demonstrated to be sensitive to changes in cognitive functioning in patients with major depressive disorder and offers promise as a clinical decision-making tool for monitoring treatment effects in this and other disorders affecting cognition.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Results
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the DSST offers a practical and effective method to monitor cognitive functions over time in clinical practice.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Implications/Conclusions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: In clinical practice, the DSST is administered in the manner in which it was validated.
In the paper
“The ability of the DSST to detect deterioration in processing speed has also been useful as a complementary cognitive assessment in the screening of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.30”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Dong Y Kua ZJ Khoo EY The utility of brief cognitive tests for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016; 17: 889– 895. 27461866 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, a meta-analysis showed significant effects of vortioxetine versus placebo in improving cognitive function assessed with the DSST in patients with MDD and that these improvements were greater than those observed with other antidepressants.45”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Baune BT Brignone M Larsen KG A network meta-analysis comparing effects of various antidepressant classes on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) as a measure of cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21: 97– 107. 29053849 PMC5793828
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In that report, data from 1904 subjects evaluated using the DSST in a total of 22 studies demonstrated an impairment of moderate magnitude among patients with MDD with a mean effect size (Cohen’s d) relative to control subjects of 0.55 (confidence interval, 0.34–0.75; P < 0.001).”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Snyder HR Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function: a meta-analysis and review. Psychol Bull. 2013; 139: 81– 132. 22642228 PMC3436964 source
boostedcorrelationaln = 1,904 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the 6-hour group, there was no change from baseline over time.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Van Dongen HP Maislin G Mullington JM The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003; 26: 117– 126. 12683469 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Banks S Dinges DF Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007; 3: 519– 528. 17803017 PMC1978335 source
plainn = 35- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies have examined neuropsychological performance, using a variety of neuropsychological tests, in patients with MDD, and overall, impairments of moderate size have been observed.40”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Lee RS Hermens DF Porter MA A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2012; 140: 113– 124. 22088608 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The second study also showed positive treatment effects on the DSST, although with a smaller effect size of 0.254 for 10 to 20 mg vortioxetine.44”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Mahableshwarkar AR Zajecka J Jacobson W A randomized, placebo-controlled, active-reference, double-blind, flexible-dose study of the efficacy of vortioxetine on cognitive function in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 40: 2025– 2037. 25687662 PMC4839526 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In an earlier report of MDD patients studied 6 months after discharge from hospital for an MDD episode, the DSST was strongly associated with the magnitude of functional recovery in work, school, and housing, yielding an odds ratio of nearly 20.46”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Jaeger J Berns S Uzelac S Neurocognitive deficits and disability in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2006; 145: 39– 48. 17045658 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The DSST is sensitive enough to distinguish changes over time between different sleep groups in sleep studies.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Van Dongen HP Maislin G Mullington JM The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003; 26: 117– 126. 12683469 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Banks S Dinges DF Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007; 3: 519– 528. 17803017 PMC1978335 source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Tucker AM Whitney P Belenky G Effects of sleep deprivation on dissociated components of executive functioning. Sleep. 2010; 33: 47– 57. 20120620 PMC2802247 source
plaincorrelationaln = 35- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The 8-hour group showed some improvement over the first few days (possibly a learning effect), whereas the 4-hour group differed from the 8-hour group by more than 12 points by the end of the first week and continued to decline over the second week.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Van Dongen HP Maislin G Mullington JM The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003; 26: 117– 126. 12683469 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Banks S Dinges DF Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007; 3: 519– 528. 17803017 PMC1978335 source
hedgedn = 35- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The effect size of 0.55 was in line with the effect sizes of other measures examined.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Snyder HR Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function: a meta-analysis and review. Psychol Bull. 2013; 139: 81– 132. 22642228 PMC3436964 source
plainn = 1,904- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, without further testing of the patient, the DSST is not informative about the nature of the deficit.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In elderly depressed patients relative to elderly control subjects, Nebes et al42 reported DSST decrements of about double this magnitude and further found that performance was worse in patients with late compared with early onset of disease (P < 0.04).”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Nebes RD Pollock BG Houck PR Persistence of cognitive impairment in geriatric patients following antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with nortriptyline and paroxetine. J Psychiatr Res. 2003; 37: 99– 108. 12842163 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, there is evidence that the impairment and change measured by the DSST reflect meaningful differences relevant to the clinical management of MDD patients.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognition is important for functioning and quality of life.
In the paper
“In elderly depressed patients relative to elderly control subjects, Nebes et al42 reported DSST decrements of about double this magnitude and further found that performance was worse in patients with late compared with early onset of disease (P < 0.04).”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Nebes RD Pollock BG Houck PR Persistence of cognitive impairment in geriatric patients following antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with nortriptyline and paroxetine. J Psychiatr Res. 2003; 37: 99– 108. 12842163 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Further, these impairments appeared to have been present from the first depressive episode.40”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Lee RS Hermens DF Porter MA A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2012; 140: 113– 124. 22088608 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Only the DSST, among a battery of neuropsychological tests, was able to measure the benefit from long-term abstinence (nearly 2 years) over short-term abstinence (6 weeks) in chronic alcoholism, suggesting its greater sensitivity to change compared with other measures.28”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] Ryan C Butters N Didario B The relationship between abstinence and recovery of function in male alcoholics. Clin Neuropsychol. 1980; 2: 125– 134.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the first study, the effect sizes of treatment with 10 or 20 mg of vortioxetine on DSST scores were, respectively, 0.51 and 0.52.43”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] McIntyre RS Lophaven S Olsen CK A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 17: 1557– 1567. 24787143 PMC4162519 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is clinically useful because it is sensitive to cognitive deficit in a wide range of brain diseases and conditions.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“As a subtest of the WAIS, the DSST has undergone repeated and rigorous psychometric validation such as test-retest reliability and discriminant validity in a range of patient samples; however, modest differences exist between these versions.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] Wechsler D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition. Bloomington, MN: PsychCorp, an imprint of Pearson Clinical Assessment; 2008.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [5] Sudarshan NJ Bowden SC Saklofske DH Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV. Psychol Assess. 2016; 28: 1489– 1501. 26866794
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A recent meta-analysis on executive dysfunction estimated the magnitude of impairment relative to control subjects on a wide array of neuropsychological tests and concluded that “MDD is reliably associated with impaired performance on neuropsychological measures of executive functioning.”41”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Snyder HR Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function: a meta-analysis and review. Psychol Bull. 2013; 139: 81– 132. 22642228 PMC3436964 source
boostedcorrelationaln = 1,904- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The percent decrement in DSST scores with age was also significantly greater in men than in women.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Greenblatt DJ Harmatz JS von Moltke LL Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazolam, a cytochrome P450 3A substrate. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 76: 467– 479. 15536461 source
plaincorrelationaln = 61- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover study, evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effect area under the curve indicated a significant influence of sex, independent of dose, on the DSST such that effects on women were seen to be greater than those on men.36”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Greenblatt DJ Harmatz JS Singh NN Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following sublingual administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 54: 282– 290. 24203450 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The DSST is often used as a pharmacodynamic marker to assess pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
plaincorrelationaln = 61- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, a meta-analysis showed significant effects of vortioxetine versus placebo in improving cognitive function assessed with the DSST in patients with MDD and that these improvements were greater than those observed with other antidepressants.45”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Baune BT Brignone M Larsen KG A network meta-analysis comparing effects of various antidepressant classes on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) as a measure of cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21: 97– 107. 29053849 PMC5793828
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This double-blind crossover study demonstrated a statistically significant effect of age on predose DSST performance, with lower baseline scores in the elderly subjects further reinforcing the effect of age on DSST performance.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Greenblatt DJ Harmatz JS von Moltke LL Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazolam, a cytochrome P450 3A substrate. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 76: 467– 479. 15536461 source
boostedcorrelationaln = 61- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Only the DSST, among a battery of neuropsychological tests, was able to measure the benefit from long-term abstinence (nearly 2 years) over short-term abstinence (6 weeks) in chronic alcoholism, suggesting its greater sensitivity to change compared with other measures.28”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] Ryan C Butters N Didario B The relationship between abstinence and recovery of function in male alcoholics. Clin Neuropsychol. 1980; 2: 125– 134.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the DSST has been demonstrated to be sensitive to change in cognitive functioning in patients with MDD and may offer an effective means to detect clinically relevant treatment effects.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such benchmarking offers an evidentiary basis for concluding that the observed improvements of DSST scores are of a magnitude likely to be clinically meaningful.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognition is important for functioning and quality of life.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In psychiatric patients, the DSST is sensitive to impairments and improvement in processing speed, executive functioning, and working memory.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 14
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
In the paper
“In fact, deficits in processing speed as measured by DSST performance may mediate a wide range of other cognitive deficits and may further reflect a final common pathway of impairment in a range of simple and complex cognitive processes that are likely to include working memory and executive functions.29”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Amaresha AC Danivas V Shivakumar V Clinical correlates of parametric digit-symbol substitution test in schizophrenia. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014; 10: 45– 50. 25042951 PMC4156309 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“now the DSST is among the most commonly used tests in clinical neuropsychology.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Purpose/Background
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Since then, the DSST was found to be the single most sensitive test, among WAIS subtests, to determine the presence of brain damage and discriminate between patient groups (including healthy comparison groups).26”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Russell EW WAIS factor analysis with brain-damaged subjects using criterion measures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1972; 39: 133– 139. 5045269
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Working memory, another executive function, is likely required to hold in mind the task rules and for the continual updating of required symbol-digit pairs.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, if pairings are rapidly learned following the first few trials, performance speed will improve because the subject will not need to refer to the key to check the accuracy of each pairing.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is a valid and sensitive measure of cognitive dysfunction impacted by many domains.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Performance on the DSST correlates with real-world functional outcomes (eg, the ability to accomplish everyday tasks) and recovery from functional disability in a range of psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST measures a range of cognitive operations.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The authors showed that both elderly and young subjects improved not only within each day but also between days.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Beres CA Baron A Improved digit symbol substitution by older women as a result of extended practice. J Gerontol. 1981; 36: 591– 597. 7264244 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Good performance on the DSST requires intact motor speed, attention, and visuoperceptual functions, including scanning and the ability to write or draw (ie, basic manual dexterity).”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and described (quoting Kinsbourne) DSST responses as “the end product of the integration of visual perceptual, oculomotor, fine manual motor, and mental functions.””
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [19] Darby D Walsh K Neuropsychology. 5th ed Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For example, Glosser et al27 noted the sensitivity of the DSST in alcoholic Korsakoff patients, patients with right hemisphere damage, and patients with chronic alcoholism.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Glosser G Butters N Kaplan E Visuoperceptual processes in brain damaged patients on the digit symbol substitution test. Int J Neurosci. 1977; 7: 59– 66. 893004 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The decision to consciously engage in this learning strategy to improve performance speed calls for the executive functions of planning and strategizing.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Performance might also be affected by associative learning.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Darby and Walsh19 emphasized that performance on the DSST is the final common pathway for expression of quite diverse types of impairment”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > What Does the DSST Measure?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [19] Darby D Walsh K Neuropsychology. 5th ed Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is perhaps the most commonly used test in all of neuropsychology, owing to several inherent properties: brevity, reliability, and the minimal impact of language, culture, and education on test performance.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tucker et al39 also measured the effect of sleep deprivation on DSST performance and yielded similar results.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Tucker AM Whitney P Belenky G Effects of sleep deprivation on dissociated components of executive functioning. Sleep. 2010; 33: 47– 57. 20120620 PMC2802247 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the validity and reliability of the paper DSST depend on the test being administered in the manner it was validated.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The 8-hour group showed some improvement over the first few days (possibly a learning effect), whereas the 4-hour group differed from the 8-hour group by more than 12 points by the end of the first week and continued to decline over the second week.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Sensitivity and Sensitivity to Change of the DSST
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Van Dongen HP Maislin G Mullington JM The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003; 26: 117– 126. 12683469 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Banks S Dinges DF Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007; 3: 519– 528. 17803017 PMC1978335 source
plaincorrelationaln = 35- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST is sensitive to both the presence of cognitive dysfunction and change in cognitive function, across a wide range of clinical populations.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Performance on the DSST correlates with real-world functional outcomes (eg, the ability to accomplish everyday tasks) and recovery from functional disability.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, where the objective of testing is not diagnosis, but rather to identify impairment regardless of its nature and origin or to detect change within a patient, a brief and simple test such as the DSST may offer important benefits to clinical practice.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As discussed previously, the DSST's sensitivity to change is one of its main strengths.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The utility of the DSST for monitoring patients in the clinic derives from several properties, many of which are shared by other neuropsychological tests, including its brevity, its sensitivity to change, and minimal impact from education and culture.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognition is important for functioning and quality of life.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the context of clinical decision making in a physician's office, this simple cognitive test can, in combination with a psychiatric clinical evaluation, be useful at the level of the individual patient for medication choice and dosing.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Cognition is important for functioning and quality of life.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DSST offers high sensitivity to detect impairment, but low specificity to determine exactly which cognitive domain has suffered the impairment.”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > CONCLUDING COMMENTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, there is growing awareness of the prevalence of cognitive symptoms and their impact on life functioning in MDD patients, leading to an increase in the recognition of such symptoms as clinically important targets for therapeutic improvement.47”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY > Clinical Meaningfulness in Patients With MDD
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Mattingly G Anderson RH Mattingly SG The impact of cognitive challenges in major depression: the role of the primary care physician. Postgrad Med. 2016; 128: 665– 671. 27500820 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
In clinical practice, the DSST is administered in the manner in which it was validated.
“the validity and reliability of the paper DSST depend on the test being administered in the manner it was validated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Cognition is important for functioning and quality of life.
“Although the importance of cognition for functioning and quality of life may be regarded as self-evident”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Enhanced processing speed has been correlated with improved ability to perform day-to-day tasks and a lower risk of future cognitive/mobility/mood disorders [32].”
From Health Benefits of Video Games in Adolescents and Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
“The original WAIS, developed in 1955, has 90 stimulus items (number of blanks into which the symbols are copied)”
§ Digit Symbol Substitution Test > DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
“all of which were among the 67 stimulus items in its predecessor, the WBIS.”
Citations
Cites
Van Dongen, H. P. A., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., & Dinges, D. F. (2003) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/26.2.117 · Cited by 3,173
(1995) · Cited by 2,809
Randolph, C., Tierney, M. C., Mohr, E., & Chase, T. N. (1998) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823 · Cited by 2,519
Snyder, H. R. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028727 · Cited by 1,667
Behavioral and Physiological Consequences of Sleep Restriction
Banks, S., & Dinges, D. F. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.26918 · Cited by 1,505
Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., McInnes, L., & Rabbitt, P. (1994) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000106735 · Cited by 1,078
The Measurement of Adult Intelligence.
Wechsler, D. (1940) · Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280030188021 · Cited by 980
Benedict, R. H. B., DeLuca, J., Phillips, G. A., LaRocca, N. G., Hudson, L. D., & Rudick, R. A. (2017) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458517690821 · Cited by 846
A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode Major Depressive Disorder
Lee, R. S. C., Hermens, D. F., Porter, M. A., & Redoblado-Hodge, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.023 · Cited by 737
SAHAKIAN, B. J., MORRIS, R. G., EVENDEN, J. L., HEALD, A., LEVY, R., PHILPOT, M., & ROBBINS, T. W. (1988) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/111.3.695 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Falck, R. S., Davis, J. C., Best, J. R., Crockett, R. A., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2019) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.03.007 · Cited by 437
Dong, X. Z., Li, S., Sun, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030840 · Cited by 217
Herring, W. J., Ceesay, P., Snyder, E., Bliwise, D., Budd, K., Hutzelmann, J., Stevens, J., Lines, C., & Michelson, D. (2020) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12035 · Cited by 185
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O., Atli, M., Bennett, J. C., Croal, M., DeBattista, C., Dunlop, B. W., Feifel, D., Hellerstein, D. J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.108 · Cited by 191
Adolescent cannabis use, cognition, brain health and educational outcomes: A review of the evidence
Lorenzetti, V., Hoch, E., & Hall, W. (2020) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.03.012 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaeger, J.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jaeger, Judith
- ORCID
- Jaeger, Judith
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 513-519
- ISSN
- 0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-712X
- PMC
- PMC6291255
- OpenAlex
- W2888254436
- Semantic Scholar
- 03a57054a4cacf4a26d3972a3d9d226a7a3b0249
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 17
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- Digit Symbol Substitution Test, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological assessment, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, treatment monitoring, functional disability, sensitivity to change, associative learning, clinical decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Association Learning, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
