The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and Predictors of “Subjective Cognitive Complaints” in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES To document the prevalence of self- and informant report of cognitive problems, usually referred to as "subjective cognitive complaints" (SCCs), in a community-dwelling sample of older adults and to examine the relationship between SCCs and objective impairment, mood, and personality measures. PARTICIPANTS Eight hundred twenty-seven nondemented community-dwelling adults aged 70-90 years. MEASUREMENTS Participants were asked 24 SCC questions, including the Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q), and completed neuropsychological testing in the domains of memory, language, executive function, visuospatial skills, and psychomotor speed. The Geriatric Depression Scale, Goldberg Anxiety Scale, and Neuroticism, Openness, and Conscientiousness from the NEO-Five Factor Inventory were used as measures of participants' psychological status. Informants completed 19 SCC questions, including a modified short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). RESULTS Overall, 95.5% of participants or their informants endorsed at least one SCC. Although participants were more likely to endorse a memory complaint, informants seemed more accurate in endorsing a complaint when cognitive impairment was objectively present. SCC correlated with participants' scores on measures of depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and inversely with measures of openness and conscientiousness. Age, education, and sex had little impact on these effects. Regression analysis showed that psychological factors explained the number of complaints more than cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS The usefulness of SCCs as a criterion for mild cognitive impairment is questioned because of their high prevalence and their relationship to psychological factors. This may be helpful for clinicians to bear in mind when presented with patients with cognitive complaints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L. ‐., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L., Albert, M., Almkvist, O., et al. (2004) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x · Cited by 4,946
Reisberg, B., & Gauthier, S. (2007) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610207006412 · Cited by 338
The pre-mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive impairment stage of Alzheimer’s disease.
Reisberg, B., Prichep, L., Mosconi, L., John, E. R., Glodzik‐Sobanska, L., Boksay, I., Monteiro, I., Torossian, C., Vedvyas, A., Ashraf, N., et al. (2008) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2007.11.017 · Cited by 312
JORM, A. F., CHRISTENSEN, H., KORTEN, A. E., JACOMB, P. A., & HENDERSON, A. S. (2001) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291701003245 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Jessen, F., Amariglio, R. E., van Boxtel, M., Breteler, M., Ceccaldi, M., Chételat, G., Dubois, B., Dufouil, C., Ellis, K. A., van der Flier, W. M., et al. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001 · Cited by 3,014
Self-citationImplementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies
Molinuevo, J. L., Rabin, L. A., Amariglio, R., Buckley, R., Dubois, B., Ellis, K. A., Ewers, M., Hampel, H., Klöppel, S., Rami, L., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.012 · Cited by 575
Subjective Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease
Rabin, L. A., Smart, C. M., & Amariglio, R. E. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045136 · Cited by 590
Subjective Cognitive Impairment and Affective Symptoms: A Systematic Review
Hill, N. L., Mogle, J., Wion, R., Munoz, E., DePasquale, N., Yevchak, A. M., & Parisi, J. M. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw091 · Cited by 277
Functional cognitive disorders: a systematic review
McWhirter, L., Ritchie, C., Stone, J., & Carson, A. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30405-5 · Cited by 240
Sachdev, P. S., Lipnicki, D. M., Crawford, J., Reppermund, S., Kochan, N. A., Trollor, J. N., Wen, W., Draper, B., Slavin, M. J., Kang, K., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059649 · Cited by 193
Self-citationAre Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?
Clark, L. R., Delano-Wood, L., Libon, D. J., McDonald, C. R., Nation, D. A., Bangen, K. J., Jak, A. J., Au, R., Salmon, D. P., & Bondi, M. W. (2013) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617713000313 · Cited by 167
Cheng, Y.-W., Chen, T.-F., & Chiu, M.-J. (2017) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s123428 · Cited by 150
Snitz, B. E., Weissfeld, L. A., Cohen, A. D., Lopez, O. L., Nebes, R. D., Aizenstein, H. J., McDade, E., Price, J. C., Mathis, C. A., & Klunk, W. E. (2015) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2015.01.008 · Cited by 140
Correlates of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Older Adults
Flatt, J. D., Johnson, J. K., Karpiak, S. E., Seidel, L., Larson, B., & Brennan-Ing, M. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-171061 · Cited by 83
Aberrant memory system connectivity and working memory performance in subjective cognitive decline
Viviano, R. P., Hayes, J. M., Pruitt, P. J., Fernandez, Z. J., van Rooden, S., van der Grond, J., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Damoiseaux, J. S. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.015 · Cited by 77
Hahn, E. A., & Lachman, M. E. (2015) · Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2014.888391 · Cited by 54
Yasuno, F., Kazui, H., Yamamoto, A., Morita, N., Kajimoto, K., Ihara, M., Taguchi, A., Matsuoka, K., Kosaka, J., Tanaka, T., et al. (2015) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.03.006 · Cited by 44
Marchant, N. L., Barnhofer, T., Klimecki, O. M., Poisnel, G., Lutz, A., Arenaza‐Urquijo, E., Collette, F., Wirth, M., Schild, A., Coll‐Padrós, N., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.010 · Cited by 38
“only prevalent among patients with SCD [12,41] but may also represent a risk factor for dementia [8,21,42], this study aims to provide an initial step toward testing the potential of mindfulness-based training as a new form of intervention to improve well-being and prevent cognitive decline and ultimately delay the on…”
BackgroundActual memory as a mediator of the amyloid‐subjective cognitive decline relationship
Chen, X., Farrell, M. E., Moore, W., & Park, D. C. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.007 · Cited by 19
Dong, C., Liu, T., Wen, W., Kochan, N. A., Jiang, J., Li, Q., Liu, H., Niu, H., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.08.011 · Cited by 18
Self-citationYoo, I., Woo, J.-M., Lee, S.-H., Fava, M., Mischoulon, D., Papakostas, G. I., Kim, E.-J., Chung, S., Ha, J. H., & Jeon, H. J. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.038 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Slavin, M. J., Brodaty, H., Kochan, N. A., Crawford, J. D., Trollor, J. N., Draper, B., & Sachdev, P. S.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 701-710
- ISSN
- 1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009553435
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
