Cited by 26Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effects of a Newly Developed Gratitude Intervention Program on Work Engagement Among Japanese Workers: A Pre- and Posttest Study

Komase, Yu, Watanabe, Kazuhiro, Imamura, Kotaro, Kawakami, Norito·2019·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a 3-week gratitude intervention program that included gratitude lists and behavioral gratitude expression and to examine the effect of the program on work engagement, gratitude, self-efficacy, psychological distress, and job performance in a pretest-posttest study design. METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-five employees were recruited for the study. The outcomes were measured at baseline, postintervention, and at 6-week follow-up. Estimated means at the three points were compared in a mixed model for repeated measures. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five workers were included and analyzed. Work engagement showed no significant improvement after the intervention. However, gratitude, self-efficacy, psychological distress, and job performance improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The program might be effective for improving gratitude, self-efficacy, psychological distress, and job performance, but further modification of the program is needed to improve the effect on work engagement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0000000000001661

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komase, Y., Watanabe, K., Imamura, K., & Kawakami, N.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawakami, Norito
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2019-09
Volume
61
Issue
9
Pages
e378-e383
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960278520
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K21509)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
gratitude interventions, work engagement, self-efficacy, psychological distress, employee performance, workers, Japanese workers
MeSH terms
Work Performance, Work Engagement, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Workplace, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review