Cited by 204Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Effectiveness of Gefitinib against Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with the Uncommon EGFR Mutations G719X and L861Q

Open access
Watanabe, Satoshi, Minegishi, Yuji, Yoshizawa, Hirohisa, Maemondo, Makoto, Inoue, Akira, Sugawara, Shunichi, Isobe, Hiroshi, Harada, Masao +4 more·2014·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In non-small-cell lung cancer, an exon 19 deletion and an L858R point mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are predictors of a response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, it is uncertain whether other uncommon EGFR mutations are associated with sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis to assess prognostic factors was performed with the use of patients with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion, L858R, G719X, and L861Q) who were treated with gefitinib in the NEJ002 study, which compared gefitinib with carboplatin-paclitaxel as the first-line therapy. RESULTS: In the NEJ002 study, 225 patients with EGFR mutations received gefitinib at any treatment line. The Cox proportional hazards model indicated that performance status, response to chemotherapy, response to gefitinib, and mutation types were significant prognostic factors. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter among patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (G719X or L861Q) compared with OS of those with common EGFR mutations (12 versus 28.4 months; p = 0.002). In the gefitinib group (n = 114), patients with uncommon EGFR mutations had a significantly shorter OS (11.9 versus 29.3 months; p < 0.001). By contrast, OS was similar between patients with uncommon mutations and those with common mutations in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group (n = 111; 22.8 versus 28 months; p = 0.358). CONCLUSIONS: The post-hoc analyses clearly demonstrated shorter survival for gefitinib-treated patients with uncommon EGFR mutations compared with the survival of those with common mutations and suggest that the first-line chemotherapy may be relatively effective for non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jto.0000000000000048

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Therasse P Arbuck SG Eisenhauer EA New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000 92 205 216 10655437

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watanabe, S., Minegishi, Y., Yoshizawa, H., Maemondo, M., Inoue, A., Sugawara, S., Isobe, H., Harada, M., Ishii, Y., Gemma, A., Hagiwara, K., & Kobayashi, K.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Nippon Medical School (JP)
  • Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital (JP)
  • Miyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP)
  • Sendai Kousei Hospital (JP)
  • KKR Sapporo Medical Center (JP)
  • Sapporo National Hospital (JP)
  • Dokkyo University (JP)
  • Saitama Medical University (JP)
  • Saitama International Medical Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshizawa, Hirohisa
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
189-194
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053603900
Cited by
204
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
gefitinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, G719X, L861Q, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, prognostic factors, overall survival, carboplatin-paclitaxel, first-line chemotherapy, exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genotype, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Quinazolines, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Sequence Deletion, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review