Cited by 9Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus in Spanish: a global feasibility trial.

Open access
Beukes, Eldré W., Munzo, Maria F., Andersson, Gerhard, Manchaiah, Vinaya·2022·International Journal of Audiology

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) for tinnitus is an evidence-based intervention, but only available in a few languages. To increase accessibility, ICBT was translated into Spanish. This study's objective was to determine the feasibility of ICBT for Spanish speakers. A single-group pre-test post-test design was used. Compliance, engagement, acceptance and outcome feasibility were measured. Forty-six Spanish speakers with tinnitus were screened. There were 32 participants meeting the eligibility criteria, with a mean age of 47 (±11) years. Of these 91% were Hispanic or Latino with 66% living in Spain and 34% living in South America. Outcome feasibility was established, as a large pre- and post-test within-group effect size of d = 0.90 was found for tinnitus severity. Large pre- and post-test effect sizes were also present for the secondary outcomes of anxiety and depression with a medium effect for insomnia, health-related quality of life, and tinnitus cognitions. Intervention engagement and compliance were not optimal although no participants withdrew. Intervention acceptance rates indicated scope for improvement. ICBT for Spanish communities appears to be feasible. A randomised controlled trial is required to further investigate the effects and identify ways of improving engagement and attracting Spanish speakers from different countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14992027.2021.1971780

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

2 tests recomputed · 1 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

5 of 32 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus is seldom provided because of a lack of professionals with expertise in providing it.

    “Unfortunately, it is seldomly provided to those with tinnitus due to a lack of professionals with expertise in providing CBT for tinnitus (Bhatt, Lin, & Bhattacharyya, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bhatt, Lin, & Bhattacharyya, 2016 source

      The Results and Discussion report that CBT was the least commonly discussed treatment option and was rarely discussed with patients seeking advice for tinnitus. The paper does not establish how often CBT was provided or attribute its limited discussion to a lack of professionals with relevant expertise. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Participant engagement with the intervention was highly variable.

    “Participant engagement with the intervention was highly variable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Medium effects were present for insomnia (d=0.63 imputation analysis; d=0.65 completers analysis).

    “Medium effects were present for insomnia (d = 0.63 imputation analysis; d =65 for completers analysis), health-related quality of life (d = 0.53 imputation analysis; d =55 for completers analysis), and tinnitus cognitions (d = 0.60 imputation analysis; d =75 for completers analysis).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Most satisfaction questions scored an average of 3 to 3.5 out of 5.

    “An average score of 51/75 (68%) was obtained for the post-intervention satisfaction questionnaire with most questions scoring an average of 3 to 3.5 out of 5 for questions such as suitability of the information, ease of navigation, and benefit of the topics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At follow-up, further improvements were evident for all outcomes except for anxiety and depression.

    “At follow-up, further improvements were evident for all outcomes except for anxiety and depression (See Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 24
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus has demonstrated efficacy in nine randomized controlled trials in Europe, with moderate effect sizes for tinnitus distress and insomnia and improvements in anxiety, depression, and quality of life.

    “Its efficacy has been demonstrated in nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Europe indicating a moderate effect size for both tinnitus distress and insomnia and improvements for anxiety, depression, and quality of life (Beukes et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beukes et al., 2019 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Public attitudes toward internet interventions are variable and acceptability can be obscured by misinformation regarding their effectiveness.

    “Public attitudes toward internet interventions are variable and acceptability of such interventions can be obscured by misinformation regarding their effectiveness (Apolinário-Hagen et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Apolinário-Hagen et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs checklist was used to ensure best practice.

    “To ensure that best practice was followed, the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs checklist (Des Jarlais, Lyles, Crepaz, & Trend Group, 2004) was used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Des Jarlais, Lyles, Crepaz, & Trend Group, 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Intervention completion rates are lower than past trials ranging between 57-95%, but similar to recent trials.

    “Intervention completion rates are lower than past trials ranging between 57–95% (Beukes et al., 2019), but these lower rates are similar to recent trials (Beukes et al., 2021c, 2021d, 2021e).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beukes et al., 2019 source

      The Results > Study Characteristics section reports postintervention attrition of 4%–75%, not intervention completion rates of 57%–95%. I searched for the stated range and for intervention completion or adherence, but found no passage in our copy establishing that range. The comparison with recent trials is attributed to the separate 2021 citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Beukes et al., 2021c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beukes et al., 2021d

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Limited uptake of the intervention by Spanish-speaking communities was surprising, with unclear reasons.

    “Asurprising result was the limited uptake of this intervention by the Spanish-speaking communities, although the reasons for this are unclear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During recruitment, the Spanish pages were viewed by 285 Spanish speakers, with an average view duration of 2 minutes and an average of 3 of 8 recruitment pages viewed.

    “During the recruitment period, the Spanish pages were viewed by 285 Spanish speakers. The views lasted for an average of 2 minutes with an average of 3 of the 8 recruitment pages being viewed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the recruitment target was reached, recruiting Spanish speakers was difficult and required numerous campaigns.

    “Although the recruitment target was reached, recruiting Spanish speakers was difficult and it required numerous campaigns, including contracting a company to boost recruitment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Forty-six Spanish-speakers with tinnitus were screened.

    “46 Spanish-speakers with tinnitus were screened.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Clinically significant change was obtained by 14/32 (44%) at both T1 and T2 for imputation data and by 8/22 (36%) at T1 and 6/16 (50%) at T2 for completers-only data.

    “This was obtained by 14/32 (44%) at both T1 and T2 for the imputation data and 8/22 (36%) at T1 and 6/16 (50%) at T2 for the completers only data .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, there was a weekly reduction in tinnitus distress (THI-S) and tinnitus qualities (TQQ).

    “Overall, there was a weekly reduction in tinnitus distress (THI-S) and tinnitus qualities (TQQ), as seen in Figure 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All participants logged in at least once and completed at least one worksheet.

    “All participants logged in at least once and completed at least 1 worksheet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 46 screened, 3 did not meet inclusion criteria due to low TFI scores and 11 were unable to do the intervention during the given timeframe.

    “Of these, 3 did not meet the inclusion criteria due to low scores on the TFI (below 25/100) and 11 were unable to do the intervention during the given timeframe (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 44% of participants indicated clinically significant changes at post-intervention, similar to 38% in a UK pilot but lower than 70% in a US pilot.

    “In the current sample, only 44% of participants indicated clinically significant changes at post-intervention, which is similar to the 38% for a pilot study in the UK (Beukes et al., 2017) but lower than that of a recent pilot trial in the US of 70% (Beukes et al., 2021c).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beukes et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beukes et al., 2021c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants mentioned finding new techniques helpful and learning a lot from the online program.

    “Some participants mentioned finding the new techniques helpful saying: “I’ve learned new techniques of relaxation, to breathe and decrease tension I was carrying around,” and learning a lot from the program although it was online: “you learn the same as if one had the professor in front of you teaching you, at least in my case, I took it as a course just like the ones I do in my profession.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of participants lived in Spain (69%) and the remainder lived in South America (31%).

    “The majority lived in Spain (69%), while the others (31%) were living in South America.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The weekly reduction was significant for TQQ [F(7,7.80)=3.45, p=.002*], but not for THI-S [F(7,63.33)=2.16, p=.05*].

    “This reduction was only significant for the TQQ [F(7,7.80) = 3.45, p = .002*], but not for the THI-S [F(7,63.33) = 2.16, p = .05*].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported that the intervention helped them better manage tinnitus and control their mood.

    “When answering the open-ended question, participants explained that the intervention has helped them better manage the tinnitus saying: “I’ve learned to deal with the tinnitus and control it. It has less of an impact on my life now as I am more capable of managing it,” and gain other perspectives with statements such as “I see situations differently now and it has helped me control my mood.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Module 1 was opened by 31 (97%) participants, while the optional listening tips module was opened by 12 (38%).

    “Module 1 was opened by 31 (97%) participants whereas the later modules were opened by fewer participants, with the lowest for the optional module on listening tips opened by 12 (38%) of the participants (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean age of participants was 47 years with a standard deviation of 11 years.

    “with a mean age of 47 (± 11) years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Overall, participants were satisfied with the intervention, although the rating of 68% is lower than reported for similar interventions (e.g., 86% in a UK pilot).

    “Overall, participants were satisfied with the intervention, although the rating of 68% is lower than reported for similar interventions (e.g., 86% for a pilot trial in the UK, Beukes et al., 2017, 2018d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beukes et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beukes et al., 2018d

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No participants withdrew during the study.

    “No participants withdrew during the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy has improved access to cognitive behavioural therapy for various psychiatric and somatic disorders, including tinnitus.

    “internet based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) has improved access to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for a range of psychiatric and somatic disorders, including tinnitus (Andersson et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Andersson et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tinnitus is often associated with additional difficulties such as insomnia, anxiety, and depression.

    “Tinnitus is often associated with additional difficulties such as insomnia, anxiety, and depression (Salazar et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Salazar et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Spanish translations of all outcome measures were used.

    “Spanish translations (Manchaiah et al., 2020a) of all outcome measures were used as shown in Table 1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manchaiah et al., 2020a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Missing data were handled through multiple imputation using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.

    “Initially missing data were handled through multiple imputation using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach due to a non-significant result for the assumption of missing data Little’s MCAR test (X2 = 17.50 (24) = .83).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The missing data were completely missing at random.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The post-intervention completion rate was 69% (n=22) and the follow-up completion rate was 50% (n=16).

    “The number of participants completing the outcome measures were reduced as the trial progressed with a post-intervention completion rate of 69% (n=22) and follow-up completion rate of 50% (n=16) as seen in Figure 1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.

    “Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA (IRB-FY20–200).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT04335929.

    “The study protocol was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04335929).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy is a means of accessing evidence-based interventions.

    “ICBT is a means of accessing evidence-based interventions, and the COVID-19 pandemic has furthermore highlighted the need for evidence-based eHealth approaches to overcome limited in-person contact and support available for individuals with tinnitus (Beukes et al., 2020b, 2021b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beukes et al., 2020b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beukes et al., 2021b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A completer-only analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis.

    “As this cannot be ascertained due to the large amount of missing data, a completer’s only analysis was also done as a sensitivity analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Placebo effects may be present and could elevate the findings.

    “Furthermore, placebo effects may be present which could elevate findings and need to be considered during result interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Intervention engagement and compliance were not optimal although no participants withdrew.

    “Intervention engagement and compliance were not optimal although no participants withdrew.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spanish is spoken by approximately 580 million people globally and is the largest non-English language spoken in the United States.

    “Spanish is spoken by approximately 580 million people across the globe and is the largest non-English language spoken in the US according to the 2017 census (US Census Bureau, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites US Census Bureau, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Linear mixed models were used to account for repeated measures and incorporate all available data points.

    “Finally, linear mixed models (LMM) using maximum likelihood with random intercept for participants were used to account for repeated measures and incorporate all available data points in the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The results were not intended to evaluate the efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy because no control group was included and only a small sample was studied.

    “The results were not intended to evaluate the efficacy of ICBT as no control group was included and only a small sample was studied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The reliable change index was used to calculate clinical significance of changes on the Tinnitus Functional Index.

    “The reliable change index (RCI) (Jacobson & Truax, 1991) was used as a means of calculating clinical significance of the changes on the TFI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jacobson & Truax, 1991 source
36 of 36
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Spanish was the first language or preferred language of those interested in the intervention.

    “It was not explicitly stated, but it was assumed that Spanish was the first language or their preferred language of those interested in the intervention.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The missing data were completely missing at random.

    “This approach relies on the data being completely missing at random.”
2 of 2

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value across alpha = .05: F(7,7.80) = 3.45, p = .002

    Major

    The paper reports p = .002 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .054. The two fall on opposite sides of alpha = .05. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .054

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(7, 7.8) = 3.45reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .054The two fall on opposite sides of .05

    “F(7,7.80) = 3.45, p = .002”

  • ConsistentF(7, 63.33) = 2.16reported p = .05 · recomputed p = .050

    “F(7,63.33) = 2.16, p = .05”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Participants living in Spain reported as 66% vs 69%

    Minor

    The abstract says 66% of participants lived in Spain, but the Results section says 69%. These cannot both describe the same 32-participant sample.

  • Follow-up clinically significant change rate is miscalculated

    Minor

    Six of 16 participants is 37.5%, not the reported 50%.

    Reported 50 · recomputed 37.5

  • Not every participant could have read the initial module

    Minor

    The discussion says all participants read the initial modules, but the results say only 31 participants opened module 1.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beukes E. W., 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  2. World health statistics, 2019, Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beukes, E. W., Munzo, M. F., Andersson, G., & Manchaiah, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
  • Lamar University (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Venue
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2021-09-23
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
632-641
ISSN
  • 1499-2027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8186
OpenAlex
W3199952016
Cited by
8
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21DC017214)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, tinnitus, Spanish-language intervention, feasibility, intervention engagement, intervention adherence, intervention acceptance, anxiety, depression, insomnia, health-related quality of life, Hispanic/Latino populations
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review