Cited by 243Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyEmergency and Acute Care Studies

ED door-to-antibiotic time and long-term mortality in sepsis.

Open access
Peltan, Ithan D., Brown, Samuel M., Bledsoe, Joseph R., Sorensen, Jeffrey, Samore, Matthew H., Allen, Todd L., Hough, Catherine L.·2019·Chest

Abstract

Background The impact of antibiotic timing on sepsis outcomes remains controversial due to conflicting results from previous studies. Objectives This study investigated the association of door‐to‐antibiotic time with long‐term mortality in ED patients with sepsis. Methods This retrospective cohort study included nontrauma adult ED patients with clinical sepsis admitted to four hospitals from 2013 to 2017. Only patients’ first eligible encounter was included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the adjusted association between door‐to‐antibiotic time and 1‐year mortality. Secondary analyses used alternative antibiotic timing measures (antibiotic initiation within 1 or 3 h and separate comparison of antibiotic exposure at each hour up to hour 6), alternative outcomes (hospital, 30‐day, and 90‐day mortality), and alternative statistical methods to mitigate indication bias. Results Among 10,811 eligible patients, median door‐to‐antibiotic time was 166 min (interquartile range, 115‐230 min), and 1‐year mortality was 19%. After adjustment, each additional hour from ED arrival to antibiotic initiation was associated with a 10% (95% CI, 5‐14; P < .001) increased odds of 1‐year mortality. The association remained linear when each 1‐h interval of door‐to‐antibiotic time was independently compared with door‐to‐antibiotic time ≤ 1 h and was similar for hospital, 30‐day, and 90‐day mortality. Mortality at 1 year was higher when door‐to‐antibiotic times were > 3 h vs ≤ 3 h (adjusted OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13‐1.43) but not > 1 h vs ≤ 1 h (adjusted OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98‐1.62). Conclusions Delays in ED antibiotic initiation time are associated with clinically important increases in long‐term, risk‐adjusted sepsis mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.008

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of 10,811 patients treated in four Utah hospitals, each hour delay from ED arrival to antimicrobial administration was associated with 1.16 increased odds of in-hospital mortality and 1.10 increased odds of 1-year mortality (1.13 in patients with hypotension vs 1.09 in patients without hypotension).

    “Finally, in a study of 10,811 patients treated in four Utah hospitals, each hour delay in time from ED arrival to administration of antimicrobials was associated with 1.16 increased odds of in-hospital and 1.10 increased odds of 1-year mortality (1.13 in patients with”
  • Observational studies suggest that mortality may increase after intervals exceeding 3-5 h from hospital arrival and/or sepsis recognition.

    “Observational studies do, however, suggest that mortality may increase after intervals exceeding 3–5 h from hospital arrival and/or sepsis recognition [98, 111, 119, 120].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]17. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707-710.
  2. [40]40. Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Reply: the timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):935-936.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peltan, I. D., Brown, S. M., Bledsoe, J. R., Sorensen, J., Samore, M. H., Allen, T. L., & Hough, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Intermountain Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Peltan, Ithan D.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
155
Issue
5
Pages
938-946
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912904466
Cited by
243
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Utah
  • Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1tr001067-05, UL1TR002538, UL1TR001067)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR001067)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
sepsis, emergency department, long-term mortality, sepsis mortality, confounding by indication, antibiotic exposure
MeSH terms
Long Term Adverse Effects, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sepsis, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review