Cited by 11Pain Management and Opioid UsePharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Analgesic Use Patterns Among Patients With Dementia During Transitions From Hospitals to Skilled Nursing Facilities

Open access
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Andrea L., Block, Laura, Hovanes, Melissa, Mirr, Jacquelyn, Kolanowski, Ann·2019·Research in Gerontological Nursing

Abstract

Gaps in pain management, including discontinuity in analgesic medication prescribing, frequently complicate transitions from hospital to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for patients with dementia. The objective of the current study was to examine analgesic medication use and prescribing patterns in the last 48 hours of hospitalization and upon discharge to SNF among stroke and hip fracture patients with dementia. Of 318 patients who received an analgesic medication within the last 48 hours of hospitalization, 23% experienced potentially abrupt discontinuations upon discharge. These rates varied by medication, with acetaminophen with codeine (27%), hydromorphone (19%), and acetaminophen with hydrocodone (19%) having the highest rates of potentially abrupt discontinuations. Conversely, 38% of patients experienced potentially abrupt additions of an analgesic medication upon discharge. Findings suggest that changes to analgesic regimens prior to and upon discharge may be common practice, potentially hindering care continuity and pain control during transitions. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2019; 12(2):61–69.]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/19404921-20190122-01

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilmore-Bykovskyi, A. L., Block, L., Hovanes, M., Mirr, J., & Kolanowski, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Research in Gerontological Nursing
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2019-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
61-69
ISSN
  • 1938-2464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4921
OpenAlex
W2912672721
Cited by
11
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Gerontological Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (K76AG060005, P50AG033514)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, analgesic prescribing, pain management, stroke, hip fracture, hydromorphone, continuity of care, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Dementia, Female, Medicare, Hip Fractures, Humans, Male, Patient Transfer, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Skilled Nursing Facilities, United States, Stroke, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review