Cited by 99Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Clinical Complexity in Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Diabetes: The Health and Retirement Study

Open access
Blaum, Caroline S., Cigolle, Christine T., Boyd, Cynthia, Wolff, Jennifer L., Tian, Zhiyi, Langa, Kenneth M., Weir, David R.·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some patients with diabetes may have health status characteristics that could make diabetes self-management (DSM) difficult and lead to inadequate glycemic control, or limit the benefit of some diabetes management interventions. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how many older and middle-aged adults with diabetes have such health status characteristics. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a nationally representative health interview survey, the Health and Retirement Study, and its diabetes mail-out survey. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Americans aged 51 and older with diabetes (n = 3506 representing 13.6 million people); aged 56 and older in diabetes survey (n = 1132, representing 9.9 million). MEASUREMENTS: Number of adults with diabetes and (a) relatively good health; (b) health status that could make DSM difficult (eg, comorbidities, impaired instrumental activities of daily living; and (c) characteristics like advanced dementia and activities of daily living dependency that could limit benefit of some diabetes management. Health and Retirement Study measures included demographics. Diabetes Survey included self-measured HbA1c. RESULTS: Nearly 22% of adults > or =51 with diabetes (about 3 million people) have health characteristics that could make DSM difficult. Another 10% (1.4 million) may receive limited benefit from some diabetes management. Mail-out respondents with health characteristics that could make DSM difficult had significantly higher mean HbA1c compared with people with relatively good health (7.6% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.04.). CONCLUSIONS: Some middle-aged as well as older adults with diabetes have health status characteristics that might make DSM difficult or of limited benefit. Current diabetes quality measures, including measures of glycemic control, may not reflect what is possible or optimal for all patient groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca4035

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comprehensive assessment described provides a framework to determine goals and therapeutic approaches, including whether referral for diabetes self-management education is appropriate or whether the current plan is too complex for the individual's self-management ability or caregivers.

    “The comprehensive assessment described above provides a framework to determine goals and therapeutic approaches (8)(9)(10), including whether referral for diabetes self-management education is appropriate (when complicating factors arise or when transitions in care occur) or whether the current plan is too complex for the individual's self-management ability or the caregivers providing care (11).”

    From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion says that some middle-aged and older adults face diabetes self-management challenges and may need patient and caregiver education or other assistance. It does not describe a comprehensive assessment for deciding whether a care plan exceeds an individual’s or caregivers’ abilities, nor does it specify when to refer for diabetes self-management education. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaum, C. S., Cigolle, C. T., Boyd, C., Wolff, J. L., Tian, Z., Langa, K. M., & Weir, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
  • Blaum, Caroline S.
  • Weir, David R.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
327-334
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073776654
Cited by
99
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f32ag027649-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG021493A, R01AG021493, K23AG032910, 1F32AG027649-01, F32 AG027649, U01AG009740, R01AG027010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, diabetes self-management, clinical complexity, older adults, middle-aged adults, glycemic control, HbA1c, comorbidities, instrumental activities of daily living, activities of daily living dependence, dementia, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Treatment Failure, Glycemic Index, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review