Cited by 651Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus

California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society, Care·2003·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1532-5415.51.5s.1.x

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society panel published guidelines for improving the care of older adults with diabetes in 2003.

    “In collaboration with the ADA and other medical organizations, the California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society panel published guidelines for improving the care of older adults with diabetes in 2003.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Persistent pain, from neuropathy or other causes, or its inadequate treatment is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults including functional impairment, falls, slow rehabilitation, depression and anxiety, decreased socialization, sleep and appetite disturbances, and higher health care costs and utilization.

    “Persistent pain, from neuropathy or other causes, or its inadequate treatment is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults including functional impairment, falls, slow rehabilitation, depression and anxiety, decreased socialization, sleep and appetite disturbances, and higher health care costs and utilization2.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

  • A central concept in geriatric diabetes care guidelines is that providers should base decisions regarding treatment targets or interventions on life expectancy.

    “A central concept in geriatric diabetes care guidelines is that providers should base decisions regarding treatment targets or interventions on life expectancy2, 17, 57, 105.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society, C.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
51
Issue
5s
Pages
265-280
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2101592301
Cited by
651
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 73
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, older adults, elderly care, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aspirin, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Fibrinolytic Agents, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Hypertension, Hypoglycemic Agents, Mass Screening, Pain, Patient Education as Topic, Urinary Incontinence, Geriatric Assessment, Smoking Cessation, Diabetic Foot, Evidence-Based Medicine, Polypharmacy, Diabetes Complications, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review