Cited by 114Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation: current status and future developments

Open access
Borody, Thomas J., Brandt, Lawrence J., Paramsothy, Sudarshan·2014·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has undergone dramatic progression over the past year and continues to evolve as knowledge of the gastrointestinal microbiota (GiMb) develops. This review summarizes therapeutic advances in FMT, latest FMT therapies and presents the potential of FMT therapeutics in other gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: The GiMb is now known to have a central role in the pathogenesis of many diseases. The success of FMT in curing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is well established and preliminary findings in other gastrointestinal conditions are promising. Published data from over 500 CDI cases suggest that FMT is generally well tolerated with minimal side effects. The commercial potential of FMT is being explored with several products under development, including frozen GiMb extract, which has been shown highly effective in treating relapsing CDI. Such products will likely become more available in coming years and revolutionize the availability and method of delivery of GiMb. SUMMARY: Recent literature unequivocally supports the use of FMT in treating relapsing CDI. Trials are underway to determine the therapeutic potential of FMT in other conditions, particularly inflammatory bowel disease. Therapeutic FMT is a dynamic field with new and emerging indications along with ongoing developments in optimal mode of administration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0000000000000027

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FMT represents an emerging therapy for disease states related to dysbiosis, and is a current, recommended treatment for relapsing and non-responding Clostridium difficile infection.

    “However, FMT represents an emerging therapy for disease states related to dysbiosis, and is a current, recommended treatment for relapsing and non-responding CDI [28] .”
  • Taken together, these data indicate that FMT is a promising treatment option for serious and recurrent CDI.

    “Taken together, these data indicate that FMT is a promising treatment option for serious and recurrent CDI [309,310]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [35]Andrews PJ Barnes P Borody TJ Chronic constipation reversed by restoration of the bowel flora. A case and a hypothesis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992; 4: 245– 247
  2. [36]Andrews P Borody TJ Shortis NP Thompson S Bacteriotherapy for chronic constipation-long term follow-up [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: A563
  3. [37]Borody TJ Campbell J Torres M Reversal of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: S352
  4. [38]Borody TJ Leis S Campbell J Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: S352
  5. [43]Borody TJ Nowak A Torres M Bacteriotherapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: a retrospective review [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107 Suppl 1: S591– S592 (A1481)
  6. [44]Anathaswamy A. Fecal transplant eases symptoms of Parkinson's. New Sci 2011; 2796: 8– 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borody, T. J., Brandt, L. J., & Paramsothy, S.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Paramsothy, Sudarshan
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2014-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
97-105
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991677478
Cited by
114
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, Clostridium difficile infection, inflammatory bowel disease, gut microbiota, mode of administration
MeSH terms
Autoimmune Diseases, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Feces, Humans, Intestinal Diseases, Intestines, Recurrence, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Tissue Transplantation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review