Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-transcriptional regulation of lipoprotein receptors by the E3-ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the low-density lipoprotein receptor

Sorrentino, Vincenzo, Zelcer, Noam·2012·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

Purpose of review The hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) pathway is essential for clearing circulating LDL and is an important therapeutic target for treating cardiovascular disease. Abundance of the LDLR is subject to both transcriptional and nontranscriptional control. Here, we highlight a new post-transcriptional mechanism for controlling LDLR function via ubiquitination of the receptor by the E3-ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the LDLR (IDOL). Recent findings IDOL is a recently identified transcriptional target of the liver X receptors. Acting as an E3-ubiquitin ligase IDOL promotes ubiquitination of the LDLR, thereby marking it for lysosomal degradation. The determinants required for degradation of the LDLR by IDOL have been largely identified. IDOL also targets two related lipoprotein receptors, the very low-density lipoprotein receptor and apolipoprotein E receptor 2. Despite several similarities, the IDOL, and PCSK9 pathways for controlling LDLR abundance seem independent of each other. Genome-wide association studies have recently identified IDOL as a locus influencing variability in circulating levels of LDL, thereby highlighting the possible role of IDOL in human lipoprotein metabolism. Summary Transcriptional induction of IDOL by liver X receptor defines a new post-transcriptional pathway for controlling LDLR abundance and LDL uptake independent of sterol regulatory element binding proteins. Targeting IDOL activity may offer a novel therapeutic…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0b013e3283532947

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Calandra, 2011, Mechanisms and genetic determinants regulating sterol absorption, circulating LDL levels, and sterol elimination: implications for classification and disease risk., J Lipid Res, 52, 1885, 10.1194/jlr.R017855 · DOI
  2. Garcia, 2001, Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia caused by mutations in a putative LDL receptor adaptor protein., Science, 292, 1394, 10.1126/science.1060458 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Zelcer, 2009, LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor., Science, 325, 100, 10.1126/science.1168974 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Horton, 2002, SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver., J Clin Invest, 109, 1125, 10.1172/JCI0215593 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Im, 2011, Liver X receptors in atherosclerosis and inflammation., Circ Res, 108, 996, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226878 · DOI
  6. Olsson, 1999, MIR is a novel ERM-like protein that interacts with myosin regulatory light chain and inhibits neurite outgrowth., J Biol Chem, 274, 36288, 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36288 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Scotti, 2011, Targeted disruption of the idol gene alters cellular regulation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor by sterols and liver X receptor agonists., Mol Cell Biol, 31, 1885, 10.1128/MCB.01469-10 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mukhopadhyay, 2007, Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling., Science, 315, 201, 10.1126/science.1127085 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zhang, 2011, The IDOL-UBE2D complex mediates sterol-dependent degradation of the LDL receptor., Genes Dev, 25, 1262, 10.1101/gad.2056211 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Stolt, 2003, Origins of peptide selectivity and phosphoinositide binding revealed by structures of disabled-1 PTB domain complexes., Structure, 11, 569, 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Calkin, 2011, FERM-dependent E3 ligase recognition is a conserved mechanism for targeted degradation of lipoprotein receptors., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108, 20107, 10.1073/pnas.1111589108 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Suon, 2010, Systemic treatment with liver X receptor agonists raises apolipoprotein E, cholesterol, and amyloid- peptides in the cerebral spinal fluid of rats., Mol Neurodegener, 5, 44, 10.1186/1750-1326-5-44 · DOI
  13. Trommsdorff, 1999, Reelerdisabled-like disruption of neuronal migration in knockout mice lacking the VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2., Cell, 97, 689, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80782-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Wang, 2002, Liver X receptors in the central nervous system: from lipid homeostasis to neuronal degeneration., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99, 13878, 10.1073/pnas.172510899 · DOI
  15. Kararigas, 2012, Transcriptome characterization of estrogen-treated human myocardium identifies Myosin regulatory light chain interacting protein as a sex-specific element influencing contractile function., J Am Coll Cardiol, 59, 410, 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.054 · DOI
  16. Ishibashi, 2010, Reduced VLDL clearance in Apoe()Npc1() mice is associated with increased Pcsk9 and Idol expression and decreased hepatic LDL-receptor levels., J Lipid Res, 51, 2655, 10.1194/jlr.M006163 · DOI
  17. Waterworth, 2010, Genetic variants influencing circulating lipid levels and risk of coronary artery disease., Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 30, 2264, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.201020 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dong, 2011, Suppression of Idol expression is an additional mechanism underlying statin-induced up-regulation of hepatic LDL receptor expression., Int J Mol Med, 27, 103
  19. Horton, 2009, PCSK9: a convertase that coordinates LDL catabolism., J Lipid Res, 50, S172, 10.1194/jlr.R800091-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lagace, 2006, Secreted PCSK9 decreases the number of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and in livers of parabiotic mice., J Clin Invest, 116, 2995, 10.1172/JCI29383 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Poirier, 2009, Dissection of the endogenous cellular pathways of PCSK9-induced low density lipoprotein receptor degradation: evidence for an intracellular route., J Biol Chem, 284, 28856, 10.1074/jbc.M109.037085 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Holla, 2010, A chimeric LDL receptor containing the cytoplasmic domain of the transferrin receptor is degraded by PCSK9., Mol Genet Metab, 99, 149, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.09.012 · DOI
  23. Strom, 2010, Disrupted recycling of the low density lipoprotein receptor by PCSK9 is not mediated by residues of the cytoplasmic domain., Mol Genet Metab, 101, 76, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mayer, 2008, Annexin A2 is a C-terminal PCSK9-binding protein that regulates endogenous low density lipoprotein receptor levels., J Biol Chem, 283, 31791, 10.1074/jbc.M805971200 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gong, 2006, Sterol-regulated ubiquitination and degradation of Insig-1 creates a convergent mechanism for feedback control of cholesterol synthesis and uptake., Cell Metab, 3, 15, 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gill, 2011, Cholesterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase, a control point in cholesterol synthesis beyond HMG-CoA reductase., Cell Metab, 13, 260, 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kim, 2011, Parkin is a lipid-responsive regulator of fat uptake in mice and mutant human cells., J Clin Invest, 121, 3701, 10.1172/JCI44736 · DOI
  28. DeBose-Boyd, 2008, Feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis: sterol-accelerated ubiquitination and degradation of HMG CoA reductase., Cell Res, 18, 609, 10.1038/cr.2008.61 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sorrentino, V., & Zelcer, N.
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2012-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
213-219
ISSN
0957-9672
Cited by
55
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review